From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Colin Baxter Subject: Re: [RFC] Shrink columns dynamically Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:22:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87iniyrug0.fsf@yandex.com> References: <87bmoswkvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d198uznu.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o9ss4aj4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87inj0m5v5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <878tjwuhxe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o9sr5vzl.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <874lujv26h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o9srxtec.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87r2xntd3k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fue3xjsl.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <877ezftb39.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fue23i4l.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVByv-0004P6-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:22:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVBys-00074G-Gq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:22:45 -0400 Received: from forward2p.cmail.yandex.net ([77.88.31.17]:36813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVBys-0006l6-6X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:22:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:23:00 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou Hello, I have come to this discussion late, but I totally agree with Kaushal, whose use of tables almost mirrors my own. Kaushal> I didn't understand the root reason for this change. If one Kaushal> doesn't like using the column width cookies, then they can Kaushal> choose to not use those. Agreed! >> Moreover, I'm pretty sure you don't review every table in >> your document at the second it is opened. I do review every table immediately the org file is opened because this is my working document. The file only contains a single table of 10 columns and hundreds of rows. Kaushal> I can only request to please retain this feature; for the Kaushal> sake of people who like it. Agreed! There may be other solutions, but I wouldn't get paid searching for them. Column cookies work - and they work well for me - so why on earth remove something that is actually *useful*? Sincerely, Colin. -- -- Colin Baxter m43cap@yandex.com GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8