From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: In Support of ELPA Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:30:56 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87inixixyn.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87eftmejer.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499866972 2506 195.159.176.226 (12 Jul 2017 13:42:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:42:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 12 15:42:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVHua-0008Uj-5j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:42:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53160 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVHuf-00034D-Q8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:42:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVHjU-0002Xj-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVHjQ-0000sq-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=41699 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVHjQ-0000rx-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 09:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVHjE-0008Rz-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:30:56 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:UCDA4/GxRdwqqfK97SeLZsGTmtE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216531 Archived-At: On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:37:18 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: SM> I find it is important for GNU ELPA not to *pull* from outside hosts SM> that are not under our control. Instead code should be pushed to it by SM> people who have write access (hence take on the responsibility of paying SM> attention to copyright and such). Can GnuPG signatures satisfy that requirement so the code can be pulled? Ted