From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22143: 24.5; Emacs blocked on long lines. Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:20:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87in954r3j.fsf@web.de> References: <87d1ud6kw8.fsf@gavenkoa.example.com> <87muyh4swq.fsf@web.de> <83y3i11ywz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522941552 16312 195.159.176.226 (5 Apr 2018 15:19:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 15:19:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 22143@debbugs.gnu.org, gavenkoa@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 17:19:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f46fK-00044v-Cz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:19:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36608 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f46hP-0003lB-V1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f46hD-0003j4-91 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f46hC-0005MY-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f46hC-0005MO-B9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f46hC-0005QG-2R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 15:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22143 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22143-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22143.152294165820822 (code B ref 22143); Thu, 05 Apr 2018 15:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2018 15:20:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39561 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f46h8-0005Pm-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:20:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:43047) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f46h6-0005PZ-38 for 22143@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.191.141]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MWBA1-1f2BwG1EYD-00XOpk; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:20:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83y3i11ywz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:00:12 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:R+SyFwdv6nbct7WzUlsvWI9Y++y6Gcozouha/oy1YeC0biYXVMh 1q8ueZ/b10GmuSFDWgFPxJuEBaW1Pi9fYHe3jxv+37bzHQEHDZaDIY26TmIDmCY4LCE2q1e JPKoiMT0rODoiiZadlBDbIfK9jvfAI84EIEh1EK0Zj7V2Tjm7ooy0+dFUnOqKBnYabWQ1Tv E/vofG7nyWru6Ui3gTnWQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ThI54TlEiKk=:X+HuwuP9Yd6m7fhjoC16gv sQbOEEmsSBSMnmGZ3eVyDrxleIrtrsqFYmpQQg6BjPCV0VKVaffFb5rIp+eYzfB64KctoUdA8 QwHQ1GfKnpAW4gKKLDV5iMCu4eHriBoUKe81fgrBYYFjF85nBhjdOiDpfYE7dROe5RldH/CC+ P+cgG6jAIJNsT/LGuvNHPznZkt1pcuNXVoYT5duLJxXbPpwRgV1gjNtUEE6ka+xtBqNSf9pEX GSmpQVAmjpCgj0ishiqs/xhwNrtbo09IDju0S2Y8LK0Y2KOy+coL7wwhlLFkOq6wAfraQbuEV 4ULDvZlLpDCpnillvSmMLP0GG7HuKa1guSMD/p1HtSrI6KQkiWfd8FLkKhBhNJEJnG1JDp8HB zbutvutC6IpNKXeTddZ90d1fdngt8OlJcOtczE3z/3mbqbycBKfiCf0z/SGqH+b6BnOYbZmrc oPCEmQz2Ot8jAUGyFshP8JDfgcAJDugiwM3cUEuwlvIycEXs93K7OSukU1sowLY9lullxvM4K +iHhsvgvmnmnW5JiXp7Z/3dleAaFhjRTpSNPL62wtCXGLPoqdObCfofrsnQiHJFkBD3UBJ00v 7O+jMAyfDooQCYRN+a8P6vf10mdhi7F4iRzhDFOzt50BiYBWgqg6JzcnRFjpY+71d1e0pbf6S SJzO4VIa3CTAVmWh5u+vqI3zx3ayI6CaJiJOLMNUvJkvPS+sXPTuvdhJFJOtOMOVJ0/flchx3 xW4nc1+tns5mcUf8u/c1FApFNOjVHI5EtjzyCqMEsE+ezJm88vpj4dmnd4FC2GDLrLtk3VYh X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144929 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The bug report about slow redisplay in this case and in similar cases > is bug#13675, and it is not marked wishlist. Ah, thanks. Didn't expect multiple reports about this. > > If we can't solve the issue with long lines in the display code, maybe > > we should do something like this by default? > > Practical and detailed proposals, let alone patches, in that direction > will be most welcome. Sorry about my ignorance, but - are there reliable means of handling such buffers other than longlines? Does longlines always behave sane with such files? Michael.