From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Encoding of etc/HELLO Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:37:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87in8l6ap1.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83sh7qxb5j.fsf@gnu.org> <87po2t6gdm.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1524245790 4626 195.159.176.226 (20 Apr 2018 17:36:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:36:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 20 19:36:26 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f9ZxO-00011k-9e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:36:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9ZzV-0001j7-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 13:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9Zyn-0001in-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 13:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9Zyi-0002Rc-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 13:37:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:41615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9Zyi-0002Qy-7r; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 13:37:44 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.40.41]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LyVIk-1eNv4c1EJi-015mgS; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:37:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:56:05 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PsRdeB/yEI4WJfCS7DUm6326UAPnyxaf/GjEM5ninqHwMXIKsm3 u5JAOuo2pwD/uw/g36uUo03jPOINHhTPLi+YCPjbnG+8PXrFqgrbdlsqelOOkQItqJEUmEi Rhc3LcZmWtq844oiJWvGRRRT7QLT9gSjReNLQuhnC648bbRM9EIFhfHoQgSH9/xCL0DZOZg WB+wmMvdEbaEyciRrFhOg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:yvxbzloRXzg=:DRGeqadgH4LTdW0lUzOYR2 BCNeIhNRChagW7iLtrOy0f/JyWBDuXWDTc3y3GVH6c42wLeVhwkZEetIpJS36wFPxZoJF8+ia WZ+nT1T6l4Aj6Ef9aUKMWEA39anJq79FoHEI5MvqOsvRlX30fEOxmy+pOq8fA+eLA+dN4R2dw 9yViCxWXjxopGlunqqhTXYenyh6BWGazeDsc5oY+cDE91UxaHTcYJTBzpXAuTso6imfWI7uIQ mTcgQeFg2Sbaw153tpxr1OW9oUBlhoZnVp47okZ8KfROGpXpPsS7pSbZzdpLFFSxnMW1NtALa uSty731RWAccdBNXdyu3rwfD74EGT5ovRs+QuAwP0bCGxgNr+W6b4cOb5XsTDYwH9AOGHFF4v Et9LIJRPkZnXQxfrlWv6d2RayO3cWEDwBtHQZHJn/G8CbPk3fVjReL/MhbXmtuWBB/t5h9Ln5 9+IL/YizIUZXz0bUJgjjW3kST7EwzcUAanv5De6I/SJ08lh4Huj6mPZ44pVHkCx0kVqAPGjk+ e4J3UzdMG9W3hcW9Gme9FlVzPuHXzY98dEif0+hfAEEAOUhV6aB6aoLBrvPi97zqZ+cDWCsRM D+rUaiQe0O0steUInpk+80EC31HwunTVCrQ0fo10jFT3wv+1Fy9NYJ3B5zQ0n0XAmUhDOu9J0 TzeImXlCVRAZWlJa1zUVET0ri2iMgh1f7WP1zuo4hdUCzAOVTiSdNQ3kTGOBBOrlObw5eAjP4 ISV4IV0icccNFMJrmjfo7D6ndgZAu0JKefLDbg3IFlMpJGD/I7kCf1lS9Hgq3XbuWQ13pdRF X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224746 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: >> No problem to revert the patch, it isn't important. > > If you revert it, please also revert commit > 0585bd643dae2592214e77998b875347e6e59bab, which I installed before > seeing this thread. Done. I've reverted 0585bd643dae2592214e77998b875347e6e59bab and c4cfb5d20487f9912f5896b3f1d291fe7ccc9804. I haven't reverted e2ae724460e6d73d3ddcc6066427471799c4bd57, because Stefan did commit a better patch on top of this. > It's true that this isn't important. Still, I like the the "hello" > emoji; it's friendly. Yes, that was the idea. It's a pity that we cannot add valid utf-8 characters to etc/HELLO, when they are not iso-2022-7bit compatible. Best regards, Michael.