From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri D'Elia Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27822: [PATCH] do not auto-remove external packages (fixes #27822) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:16:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87in4jiydl.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> References: <87y3rc8thp.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <877elugljf.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <87va8kwd4p.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533813315 28501 195.159.176.226 (9 Aug 2018 11:15:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:15:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 Cc: 27822@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 09 13:15:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fniuL-0007HF-GE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:15:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fniwQ-0006gV-5w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:17:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fniwE-0006et-Cy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fniwA-0000hk-BZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fniwA-0000hY-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fniw9-0006lE-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Yuri D'Elia Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27822 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 27822-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27822.153381337125914 (code B ref 27822); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 11:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2018 11:16:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45552 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fnivK-0006ju-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from erc.thregr.org ([46.43.2.63]:45980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fnivI-0006jk-Qd for 27822@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 07:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [2a02:27e8:20:9049:4a2a:e3ff:fe02:7265] (helo=localhost) by erc.thregr.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1fnivI-0007s5-Px (envelope-from ); Thu, 09 Aug 2018 13:16:08 +0200 In-reply-to: <87va8kwd4p.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:149375 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 09 2018, Noam Postavsky wrote: >> @@ -1763,7 +1772,9 @@ These are packages which are neither contained in > > By the way, if you run './autogen --git' you should get nicer headers > for lisp diffs. Thanks for pointing this out! As for the rest, I have no objections. I assume I don't have to tweak the patch myself.