From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 15:35:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87in2omnno.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20180925021527.10418.61555@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180925021528.9A119204E8@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87bm8lanwu.fsf@gmx.de> <87o9ck6270.fsf@gmx.de> <83h8ia6sj6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm8hape9.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538228067 32344 195.159.176.226 (29 Sep 2018 13:34:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 13:34:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 15:34:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6FO2-0008Ko-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 15:34:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6FQ9-0002i8-Jg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:36:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6FQ3-0002hs-OC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6FPy-0006VQ-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:57079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6FPl-0006Ml-NT; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.46.204]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHH3P-1g0y4c3ul9-00E2Xg; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 15:35:58 +0200 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.46.204]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHH3P-1g0y4c3ul9-00E2Xg; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 15:35:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2018 10:27:39 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:LRWqF3fXlX5wVSrqw1gUd+qbBl5ywzw0I+qQRrcltHIoId7aMj/ VwjnS72ko6tn3EGZFL++BzDAh+QZJU7DSTM5vKTPCdRsEBO3aySewWlcjZmKzdX/MXwRb+A kG2BkhVL8owBOj+xggaGu2SBpOPh3NoU4DgEcy2sSFb2vaamongBE079yenND9zwNjpQT7P X9ellgBzX89Bml2yVmMiQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:i0QUGOLko1M=:H8hjtanps1VtznZ7RTDUP8 zZgCcbDepwxuQylwPqldjPYgmOxl9A4IrQEtKj5hzA9HGr86IvotqExfaAgn/R3ypnYBp+REJ OH3YJgvYkzPGZMxKO4LP3hKdi4SbVcsIl4q9Dkc8oexrDqbMQZcLL744oOCHL9E6f5UmX4U20 cnWo/vP1q8MYFWCKwUf2k5hbDyvgKqiIjxZ6sCska9399Bo7W1ae3lGmRSaxqchQfpJvTEIqZ 3z6jbhKwG0LK3SDQVmpxcLKXFkDxNzOEROUmZ+4+QuySM5tSzsFHaQwNqy2OU1iyd4c8PLbjq 4H4ZsoAcOgpeRCzlkNXj0gM19Fnl3OykWlcKFAyET6Ho7jOT3weh9Jrqwnbz9j47manD9LqIX +kqqWRdmnbNuICDNYXio7w0jGZRWVolDSL/LFRmA0oTg1So/UMKZPVxKHBfy9PKEWEv7NoHyJ mJv5I3hdBODv6EGfVjoEfpztf7x4goDxX+lx6sr5zM1za+G4TZmKQellf+NjLlFLUPs7y7zUT 8IxfOsSxSysuOUgmopVyKF7ujOpwY0Z0RVwqLJwnda1QonZ70hxu3eYBziB66/lD1xWgEL3ER nn0TYbmhxGSMh3cExLt8Kc/JB539l4wehQzzVXxU4b+XsahpeZ471byXbez1O6Q+hRmNyrf1O T4od4uuikY8gAiJAmTXzp4C/JRaXfG/U0ffoEOqJiGTk7PDQhzGKiV2tCg7BeBitED41Rg8R9 LPx/cHVIbI08DbWFd7Oi5rJsXYnkhT5i5SGAmapoU8ojgWoW6hWK0Zu8xuy1VEhU94LCNKjt X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230139 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: Hi Paul, > All struct timespec-compatible timestamps are possible timestamps in > the filesystem I use regularly (ext4). However, (0 0 0 1000) is so > unlikely I don't think we need to worry about this, which is in > contrast to the current Tramp usage of (0 0) which corresponds to > timestamps that I have seen on real filesystems for various reasons. I've done so, thanks. Best regards, Michael.