From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33458: 27.0.50; dired loses position when reverted from outside place Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:38:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87in0pbgfb.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87k1l6f9li@posteo.net> <87muq23vsk.fsf@gmx.net> <87h8g9fpl3@posteo.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542879431 29176 195.159.176.226 (22 Nov 2018 09:37:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:37:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33458@debbugs.gnu.org To: v88m@posteo.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 22 10:37:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlQ1-0007Qo-EL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:37:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44896 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlS7-0002G7-AK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:39:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlRz-0002G2-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlRv-0004mT-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:39:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlRu-0004li-6N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlRt-0006HT-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:39:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33458 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33458-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33458.154287952124113 (code B ref 33458); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33458) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2018 09:38:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlRY-0006Gq-VN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:59323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPlRX-0006Gf-V2 for 33458@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 04:38:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([178.9.97.89]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LreCz-1fRZaO1fx7-013Qrx; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:38:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h8g9fpl3@posteo.net> (v88m@posteo.net's message of "Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:07:04 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:azIVUSsA9bDswP7wMtOM8mHBQHvomLTCC155aZ1hvqDLc1p7bnp GfQd7URpX+zCNz8n6oIkcy//UYm5MJvMrFoE6CA5JEuPpmREzqhwXW6WwZezbLS5HxwEDJQ LXlB401nGcKYf+nQ4PU6kD7E5pOvo/l6cSv85Wa4+r1+1N7yuqXRXueN6HCCUoDkZqeXzU+ yJRG0411Rwb3nn/hNw7OA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:JsqfC/xmsG4=:XKDBJ2xRzKC7YLmizH/x+U Y+5JozX2wUtHLARPaZogDBPR8bNNWAnRub3MuFwLD9KRs36FDvduZ+B7SBviCYIWhVCeLsTik b1YUlfsAAnuIUDJhB2rjsCjuqbuCUKLReSBbZUo6qZ9FULuk9Ha/qo3Z1Sb/s5ZOSL2G1arPN UEuOxicp6Prhn75Akb2gRJ+2+TiCnqDF2h/W2TG9xHbR199hBLBYyyqUOkf/llgj4ALSNBXm6 r/6hxTULpo52fYpuAeYEL6OnUr/rIu5NzsoT8JdxohWWFbixKewcpws8qjhYrgT0WJ5yhAb2+ W6TbjxyuR3rBpt4m1EGUVjr7Y0GYqx4FytPZNf/yXMISDsTaPwbm8ECbzlBmhienSPlnMhBMJ 5iId9Dm64Nq+u306hNGlaBaeuhR46TNiXo4jp2/JU6SFVCHedxJWGyrCRxGqlWlnJZq7thrf9 gp4fdhVNqV+pyZiMk5HuGcofgVGCvRO8ReJlD+2qN2dK2yUDKvFoIHhiIoV42RvyOC0M2mFho R03hS8ZlPKwn/Q1boX6JR/hE7vwlu5VGL8kv2ntB8NhO8t7+SVmWmnFM/AJxxXqOEYl2yICu/ wUQgQIhSRJB3mMKzqfFw5X81BiHzAWjNOiE3VYesgLG/Ap/3mj5zk6Bx0fXt9O9/z2b3vo3Q1 gHTISuYnW0pcjepfkp1OvrEfrYssRMG/QrhSt7D4M3g6gzc/CVlHT9S8uwhCApfLApyj0508m NQf8w8My56lUaYgGnSRJV2aYbCd0XTcMoemLDGVnZDae9oFvgTpV33EOTMaKIjhGHq47jfDr X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152666 Archived-At: On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:07:04 +0300 v88m@posteo.net wrote: > Thanks, > > On Wed, Nov 21 2018, Stephen Berman wrote: > >> I assume you used `C-x b' (switch-to-buffer) to switch back. > > No, just close DIR-B buffer or do M-: (previous-buffer). Ah, ok, didn't think of those. >> If so, this happens because dired-revert erases and then repopulates >> the buffer it's called on, which relocates the markers used by >> switch-to-buffer to find window-point when >> switch-to-buffer-preserve-window-point is t, which is it by default >> since Emacs 26. If you set that variable to nil, point will be where >> you expected after `C-x b'. > > Now it works for `C-x b' but not for M-: (previous-buffer) of closing > DIR-B buffer. Point still lost. Hmm... >> Alternatively, if you use `C-x d' (i.e. M-x dired) to return to the >> DIR-A buffer, point will be where you expected (even if >> switch-to-buffer-preserve-window-point is t). > > Yes, it does, but more consistent behavior needed. I agree. >> See bug#27243, >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2017-06/msg00147.html > > Good explanation, but your patches seems outdated and doesn't work for > me either. It seems it's necessary to go back and look at the issue again, taking your cases into account. I don't have time to do that now, but will try to when I can; maybe someone else will find a fix sooner. Steve Berman