From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33870: 27.0.50; xref-goto-xref not configurable Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:06:37 +0000 Message-ID: <87imyskvia.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a7ktqqx7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <9215183d-0a44-88b5-5b3c-d0da31f749ad@yandex.ru> <878t02egph.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874lak9kr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhscklhq.fsf@gmail.com> <87bm4qel4t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <67c9abb5-f546-361f-04ca-da96ceaca4e2@yandex.ru> <87bm4le0tm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87imys6x5s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547420704 12163 195.159.176.226 (13 Jan 2019 23:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:05:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33870@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 14 00:05:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1giooN-00030z-Fx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:04:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gioqU-00026N-3G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:07:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gioqO-00026I-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gioqN-0006df-Pa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gioqN-0006dZ-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gioqM-0001lc-4r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:07:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33870 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33870.15474208096772 (code B ref 33870); Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2019 23:06:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58183 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gioq9-0001lA-L0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com ([209.85.221.52]:42744) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gioq8-0001kv-IL for 33870@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 18:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id q18so20846773wrx.9 for <33870@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:06:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RPB3lLS+EEjwA8MU9tuwgKPWtMiLLXTQCUhB76Z8RfQ=; b=DkA9sbTqFfeLLAZcTfXGLEZ9wBTWS1Pb8UiwYUEfuIo9MbSuw1hmEReNOwyFDEgDPQ W0I39RnVaQv+YDL8CljsCa092j1mEVUCH2lGTu6A/naXnR9rmrsUJOcpSiL7xGRKj7Eg m5ogVbnCJ9TC9/3w7oaFJipc2klMfIylbjtImG1OJVbonPeI9kA/GZooyMAOjLy/Vx9B 3QVdJgXsN3Fe4fyHP9NKCuSFBjO1tlhDuhIf/beR3sSmognsvxqOq0vdjCtanTkTRQBb 5/I33yFKzXvsCRSF6vwK0z8cZeH4Kh07dy1nHzEjAvpSq2+k6Q8OGf4lG9D0c3yaMVuM 8JoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RPB3lLS+EEjwA8MU9tuwgKPWtMiLLXTQCUhB76Z8RfQ=; b=gY9059+7QXIgNc9Y4V/hJGPP1qJaie19XoeBcnLr1ugjrv+wulj8R6JEOMQ7pF/QqA f8yoXCeBWFMBbIF89jEDywEoJ031OB5CV85zypGvcbdpveG+q6+EC+3pEY4I17Nky0vp zbLkN+f+cRUW3cUcA7MVeTDNsAxcueATuDRwvF0CO3244oKjXGuE+vsxHh8l+ze/iND+ 9sIYrBXEiAav4602cuCgefz04krXjyj9dn0IXuwp69PwR+SUey+hWk0fWp8knBDR0gow 5PxbZ4whuKVBatwo+8EIv2zI6SyCUS8t5ven6VzVSi0rYpWTYXsoOweVV914qwo0e3gW vyzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdK8tOH+lXAfeS5M9az8bwoD2LEwo7Pe6GM+o0rff7UWCbbHjPB gSATf93loxIJaGzd0oKy9riGoA0t X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN77eHrtTSgrfTpuYxIPDT2GDN+jrewDPTaXl3P5TzgpsFkxxj4Ne01swoF/MIWlhugBn0oFKQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b502:: with SMTP id a2mr23116999wrd.54.1547420802261; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:06:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from lolita.yourcompany.com ([89.180.156.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n11sm17720118wrw.60.2019.01.13.15.06.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 Jan 2019 15:06:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87imys6x5s.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:54:39 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154418 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > I don't dislike the current interface, thanks for working on what it > does well. But please don't assume that the current UI is so perfect, > there is no way to make it better. Juri, if I did assume that, as you suggest, why would I be aggreeing to make it configurable? >> 1. Make the current interface configurable >> 2. Present a number of configurations for xref to work >> with and how to select them. > > Of course, it should be configurable, I completely agree, > this is the whole point of this report. Then how about reviewing my patch? It makes this configurable, and doesn't change the default configuration. > at this moment I have nothing more to say. Then if noone objects I'll push the patch I presented earlier in pa few days. It makes xref-goto-xref configurable, doesn't change the default configuration, and closes this bug. Jo=C3=A3o