From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tramp-test42-auto-load failure Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:28:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87imt73zxi.fsf@gmx.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="66660"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 15 12:34:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hc615-000HCx-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:34:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59710 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hc614-0008Gv-0l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hc5zZ-0006j8-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hc5vY-0005h8-TV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hc5vY-0005bM-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 06:28:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1560594523; bh=QTHKCmXq/gu26LedKc/3MylraAbHzwmyU0HphX5Xz14=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=IdRLv3WdyHyJmOHJkcKzkUpxW8bXSF5pDrUpw2uUVAhA1bzO/al05nSyNOT4G2Irw qUrVh358hRSpiUsIYwqOQ+OahWbv++DNWrBeCZqzvd8awRl4Hso71XNXRuIfxhlvkQ 0nUl59pp2KCmIpduT3JqDN4mdfeP9NRvgJsFY60U= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.158.18]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6ilI-1iW0Sc3rnw-00wWel; Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:28:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sat, 15 Jun 2019 07:43:53 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:eBItiGK8w8SJSwKA7lfHK2FeWt60ExSxx4muXaxNWYYR/Vy+5zI c7JQXzTMfZ+ufiSZMfDJHsybuRpjFmiVgfDdHXzZJtiqdjNI9gQ77aro+fcuk1FNG34hlf8 dexhvjZr8h99XUbio4j5MSWXrc//aHP4txRRXom0C+Fn6keLPte9u47wszra2Z29h/Cpg4A fzQG+TpshvxcCGM2ZOLhg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:stmIavvtISw=:kkP8tZHlm088YpU/GnBu74 CirXldShW4QwyQsLlNp9NgKxpRvz8Vm81IUBm6l1YPr0OINSLaUqzYfI0EcYGOtt3ubXazMde 0TxFvzA7SqKIgPipEb8eoRxokyY0dqrC0SNinlEQi6pQmj825/xKcvCExAL5+dOW3HSHTUI6u bxO7xrZYA98N9NL8AWA88WhnPblIsl5TRszGfENa8H/zjp7fZFQJHt/1pCzOlGcaXvWb2L3sm SsjxaZxvym1u/KNuZ+BbX67SBCrCtRR7nph27IMerWKFkKMfv7iULT+s5/Ob4VSCFoEsQ7U85 ZvnqFJblT6Xp3V2tQRL6GMuxcgmGhvch8UV90xa2YuTEpfw3xL/eE0jFosWVe1/vnSAat+Oed CfnNBC0GgdMzLo7qq9CQMNzYnqo/kQg/NDlkEphOMOLsTfNi5iE09TMj+r+KylgJECxP1x0ou 8iKLO40KML/HlEMCDEI6ibB/d9YHVjJ3UXrAbLBPe+Wkk8SQESNtCHsUzf79lL/qdVztTo3bS Va1hbjqOk9AUpCjfVId+ijJKaKkDBvp8Aa+iwXexNSHlBYqbciRP41Y7qT37QAlNpr3bmkT1d lhfhVV0ZrkrQbmerFiHTfN3B0C6ym0Y7oSf78CyAebw94SunvitfHFrgo7wNKUyy7dX2VD0Pg 22wm1KJGstEmeXPwO1rGZdL+tTfHj0f7a8uW0FkrnWeNtBi76qSFZupPG9oCHRvKPlCAuWKNV iEjJ4w/fPOOfyzY41XSCTFxBz+NLracRZRAiDlyXeETbhNBrAGYefnPb4x589oGdZ9fvalf7 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237660 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: Hi Juanma, > Yet I think reverting at least part of that change would be a better > fix, because now it is "expected to fail" on Windows, while the truth > is that the test is not failing; it should simply be skipped. I will check what's up once I could find an MS Windows machine. This will take some days; next week I'm not in office. Best regards, Michael.