From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25764: 26.0.50; Make some usability improvements to sieve-script management Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:12:12 -0700 Message-ID: <87imsc12xv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87vas9rg8q.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o924l0l0.fsf@tcd.ie> <87tvbw13vl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="109274"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 25764@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 09 02:13:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkw-000SI2-Tm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 02:13:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45792 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkv-0006Z3-Uc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkl-0006Yf-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkk-0002XN-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkk-0002X8-Ls for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkk-0000W3-FX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25764 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25764.15626311491941 (code B ref 25764); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2019 00:12:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdkB-0000VD-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:12:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:43442 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hkdk9-0000V0-Nx for 25764@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [207.108.197.156]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79161FA02D; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:12:19 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 09 Jul 2019 01:55:40 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162412 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I do use sieve! But I didn't write this code. Your proposed chances seem >> fine to me, though I'm wondering about the use of `ngettext' -- I saw >> some arguments on these lists recently about international/localization, >> and wasn't paying too much attention, but didn't see a clear resolution. >> Is it the consensus that we're supposed to be using `ngettext' where possible? > > Oh, I didn't notice that part. No, I don't think there's any such > consensus... There are 23 uses of `ngettext' in the sources right now, which says to me: "there's no consensus, but it's also not a problem".