From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37260: 26.3; Emacs 26.3 NEWS Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 22:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87imqbydja.fsf@petton.fr> References: <834l1v985q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="60864"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 37260@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 01 22:21:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WLW-000Ffv-8V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 22:21:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WLU-0000Uo-O2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WLP-0000TI-2C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WLO-0002Ft-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WLO-0002Fm-3s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WLN-0004Cw-UF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 20:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37260 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37260-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37260.156736922316103 (code B ref 37260); Sun, 01 Sep 2019 20:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37260) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2019 20:20:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WKk-0004Bf-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:20:23 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:36720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i4WKi-0004BQ-Nm for 37260@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:20:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <834l1v985q.fsf@gnu.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1567369214; bh=ZhxcakzhnkdFlPRSxPizPxuZ2iZS47gXxkvVbtxeXQk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ENQYCKaJTxjMgcWovdUmHzpQ7VcBfhExgqVNF/OEJhcCDcZRxu7P64V3AUSBkCEvAmTTMSY/wCOqU8euCHWMUiBkXf8/s9lqSrb3kJ0DLIJVq0mpXaQxPyBu18HWV3lIQmNEr1120BmwDQfHBnOXnXP2a7pc9DwRAEahinHUyC8= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166152 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Eli Zaretskii writes: >> 2. Is it normal that we have empty sections? > > It's an artifact of converting an RC (where empty sections are > acceptable) to a release (where they shouldn't be). Maybe next time we make a tarball for a RC of a bugfix release, we should remove all empty sections (thus only allow empty sections in pretest tarballs). Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1AWqLIYsVPF+7mvg6LzXhmr8+XgFAl1sJ/kACgkQ6LzXhmr8 +XhSiwf/fJbG2ResMWjKxnUd3lHmKbFHtSrPETnGCVZcVsDQO5ClnusAFJHqAz4o sPBmkcjY4xElzrOXQbZQmOMKbbBMvh9jYRadbLpuHgTlTMucHgwLsY1nn4sBUOFT 7L2tCX4bMAzXowURLY1iMMQMLkKLBoTMK/7VsdgZPizIKfEj0c+CrWaW8QP9dpHz BmEoYxeEEv/QlZs0xCe/eMoim2DKgZrReA2cEwf8pKq7M01MmVWrExwgrw3p3P0r oUnvgLqhBzUKaUWFRV9sbyM1Oa92Hmel+xL59ODnP7QA5f7SB15WXi7QQyZ8W7NS +ZqUbffazbWNawMrQEC9N+Dqi3wFJw== =QxAt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--