From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24459: 24.5; cl-flet and cl-labels are not properly documented Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 22:21:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87imotk94w.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87wpi7s3lu.fsf@cochranmail.com> <87bmzjz3yw.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="42291"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 24459@debbugs.gnu.org, Robert Cochran , Carlos =?UTF-8?Q?Garc=C3=ADa?= To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 12 22:22:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtz-000ArD-NQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 22:22:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNty-0001ny-6r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtr-0001nk-Cg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtq-0007Us-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53691) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtq-0007Uo-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtq-0005R5-1d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24459 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 24459-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24459.157091168820843 (code B ref 24459); Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24459) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2019 20:21:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtH-0005Q6-Ti for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:21:28 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39226) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNtE-0005Ps-Dw for 24459@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 16:21:25 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJNt9-00080E-Tf; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 22:21:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bmzjz3yw.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2016 22:42:47 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169060 Archived-At: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes: > Robert Cochran writes: > >> As for use cases, well, I don't think that *any* docstring explicitly >> spells out the 'exact purpose' of the function > > Docstrings indeed shouldn't be too verbose, but it may be worth linking > to the CL manual which has some more details on these macros. > > (cl) Function Bindings, > https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/cl/Function-Bindings.html I've now added one from the macro that didn't have one, and I don't think there more to be done here, so I'm closing the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no