From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Federico Tedin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38282: 26.3; goto-line should not share input history with other commands Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87imndkr3f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877e3va66f.fsf@gmail.com> <871ru1z6ax.fsf@gnus.org> <878so9uugg.fsf@gmx.de> <87h82xw21s.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="37761"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Albinus , Robert Pluim , 38282@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 21 19:46:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrT2-0009Vx-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:46:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45180 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrSv-0003ST-GI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:46:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrQx-0002EG-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrQw-0008OF-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrQw-0008Ny-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrQw-0007ba-HD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Federico Tedin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38282 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38282-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38282.157436182429198 (code B ref 38282); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38282) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 18:43:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrQd-0007as-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:43:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:45656) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXrQa-0007ad-LX for 38282@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id z10so5663249wrs.12 for <38282@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:43:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KBKtTXmP5527SPxdLx4pnhr0zHtjH6wOdT3jZyAbc8w=; b=F3cD+83KweBRk/nfRu+V3xq7gl0CMcR9ey0pI4Un175MIEr5tNdIljTViXqdkY2KhF OBApO5rKajanjfF4bTwaDuYs8X9qMiLrNoGHB0OE+WP8RXu8kKWcbfLHoAL07Bm6knEw DdipqfAYUp0dmfr/9Rs1/4k+Ld8hW6LwQFjuEtRzxnXITtkOft5b7lKVaJOnrfYHdH8n IZ7l+7VblbIlJibHfCwnG37aMcyDwKv+efK2/Mx3naK2ORdtaOlFkuBDh8dsiq65XUpo WdFIAuvbLex43CpbCkGhbFCI3YrjV1scDJDpBEtKYf2Y5LfLm+AYa34XDf4U6a+HxoAL XkAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KBKtTXmP5527SPxdLx4pnhr0zHtjH6wOdT3jZyAbc8w=; b=KLX8LP0eIsiGbG/1vX1unIXm8YHz4dvFp+zu07Yadh9j/O9hDH6r539gwdwbZt88PQ vqrJCM4LZc5O5GD1YQOgRBqmr92pBhiUcGuNO/JBbpPr1gaN7ZvSt3NVq8slwPDZQp0F wSBo/slGeQIow1Ozkn1Wr+D1zSzxLcfk1bxrD9obOXYPcoSt5WLPNP7kjaXBMS5pl/B7 d2rUOguCek6/AqtRcYj67Z2HVGzCujxCw5UhKyxJPDpljdS/OhjHqVX4yIC9T7IlhhYQ jxgSf4eXuB6VLC1j23mjZ1+2aUKZQxorpWDzxG2YtCrhR41Vl5D9Js6m6Hy8BqRzCKIq ZWmA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtt3QYvvYRi46AkwCkVtUZKhfep6vVbCfVG0MbVz1F13oftpn7 qRd3yVi4h3yfa72nzUYAR+Q0x99hIlk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRwrqUFisYuUG+M4hgkk65Wf8RfdcPdQhV7eZ4BMj9yqZ/OVT713jZTCft6T1i04fLWQUK+w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6a83:: with SMTP id s3mr12504468wru.159.1574361814255; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:43:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from lead ([2a02:8109:8ac0:2ff0:d17f:44c3:a5fa:4c03]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm493671wmj.44.2019.11.21.10.43.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:43:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h82xw21s.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:51:27 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172152 Archived-At: > Yes, the Emacs behaviour here has annoyed me, too. > `goto-line' basically just calls `read-number' (which calls > `read-from-minibuffer' with the "default" nil history) -- I wonder > whether it would make sense to have a separate history for `read-number' > so that all numbers that are read share a history? Or is that too > drastic? I started working on this yesterday! My initial plan was to have a separate history for `read-number', and then I thought that it might be even better to have the history be buffer-local as well; because line numbers from one buffer don't really make sense on another. After I tried some stuff I came across a problem and posted it on the Emacs SO: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/53892/buffer-local-input-history-for-read-from-minibuffer It seems like `read-from-minibuffer' doesn't like having its HIST parameter be buffer-local (but I may have misunderstood the problem). I'm going to look into it more on depth these days.