From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Sedach Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding. Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:31:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87imhj2faz.fsf@t510.orion.oneofus.la> References: <20200419004503.26161.91884@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200419004504.C65772049B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <026ef78c-3c5e-4fd8-8161-0cc2cf5771c0@default> <87o8rc2w6p.fsf@web.de> <718e93ef-f2a7-4272-9bd9-31b482409bc8@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="68290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.3.10; emacs 26.2 Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Stefan Kangas To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 04:36:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTcaB-000Hfj-VY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:36:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48546 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTcaA-0004zZ-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48654) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTcVv-0004Ao-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTcVu-0003bI-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:31:55 -0400 Original-Received: from forward106j.mail.yandex.net ([2a02:6b8:0:801:2::109]:41168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTcVt-0003Lq-KL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:31:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mxback27g.mail.yandex.net (mxback27g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:327]) by forward106j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7768311A1AD6; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:31:45 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from sas2-ee0cb368bd51.qloud-c.yandex.net (sas2-ee0cb368bd51.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c08:b7a3:0:640:ee0c:b368]) by mxback27g.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id hgEs6OI3cx-ViImwnUn; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:31:45 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oneofus.la; s=mail; t=1588127505; bh=I8FnEq2otoH4b/9U4LgM9ZexEKo0ShRQpydH9SAriO0=; h=In-reply-to:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:References:Message-ID; b=2A4PqCzdBvsf5RiBE0k7TeJKhg6dkLR6+5RrqbxEdQLdjRN2SdG/mNJf8pWwtmnUR TIhL4hfJ4TV1xdER2MhvZUMjTTGkfLa+lm7vl5k0PXFL7iM8mnR7/VI9qYpw6t2S9v uwvqjVrCepQ5Q7JRpDy7FiMMrvUJkkAW5BLU4aTQ= Authentication-Results: mxback27g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@oneofus.la Original-Received: by sas2-ee0cb368bd51.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id gRDZbYvLt9-VgR4dD47; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:31:43 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) In-reply-to: <718e93ef-f2a7-4272-9bd9-31b482409bc8@default> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:6b8:0:801:2::109; envelope-from=vas@oneofus.la; helo=forward106j.mail.yandex.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2a02:6b8:0:801:2::109 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248065 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > Why was RESULT deprecated? That is indeed bizarre. Why break existing Elisp code? David Touretzky provides lots of examples of how to use RESULT with DOTIMES and DOLIST in _Common Lisp: A Gentle Introduction_. Conceptually, RESULT is a neat way to have the DOLIST/DOTIMES/DO expression evaluate to a useful value, instead of always being nil valued. Deprecating RESULT makes it harder to port Common Lisp code to Elisp. Those are four good arguments for keeping it. -- Vladimir Sedach Software engineering services in Los Angeles https://oneofus.la