From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 22:37:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87im6s8tfn.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> <838s83ra3q.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwjocn7.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8gzpj31.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wnvmlwjq.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0rmkh68.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z35frk0.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8gxf1fg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874kio84ht.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwg6oi6.fsf@gnus.org> <86czx8bzcz.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8gl8afq.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <86zh04iwtp.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2624"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Karthik Chikmagalur , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 06:36:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBt2N-0000ZJ-Mt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 06:36:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBt2M-0005Tj-Pv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:36:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBt1n-00054d-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:60097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBt1l-0000eF-EO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80421250; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:35:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:35:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=Wvpuf1vIt4oxsBjzcXiOtYVRgx fuQrvYbJZRENW/HGQ=; b=vO8R26DqtU7UaqmexDmHbmIFotoqkwUiDsv/GlXwj7 tRSZQe3bNNZhICn52cNcFbBLY3HfgqXwgfQhZjokLFqo/YqLI+CokcK85xl4BcJ6 zY87cfrmudWN8Xdmpp3lOZ5Zp3Hi9gyQ8LAMwB23/CdQRdl1OjGmUUP9BcO0HDuw HYejhEFsSbl79ITr1Rk2gRstmiEbx+psUs10Uq3uGmSbon2qsLawan8nwb/UXByw 954JVyO4Jv13oCPEPzIHbnFqjy1Cy53mG8BT1pMFqFg+g4qK8JpfQJdFO2wSGz9O 3YCi+nBHA+7u2LatsdDVfy0jyC4jhc+csb/ETcc2+exg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Wvpuf1 vIt4oxsBjzcXiOtYVRgxfuQrvYbJZRENW/HGQ=; b=cqN2L0FT8hDpYpKWGKdfgj JEhta9CBofdhK3srvbbBbMOiKjalOhyu2HGaAW14ORiUsFNQGFsKGkxg0schEa/w V8oLb5O3Yv6ui/SRylJqrtvep8HMpP1uR+3I4Nfg9sEisOm1UEmHTPm3OJfOuA/j twdEtp39bX6tCNlObiOKLCXeEmOMzkhjpPWqn7z1hojUNBSLuEiZf0li0HViU6QT pF6rHsx6EB9fkzeqOvDyIeHQNHN9quZMeIJhecTbt9wC3Qa3UjDa453ZC7bK8c/Z ED7usVsDXFWYtP1zamy7KCdntNk9SoG97Io4OxaVqrcJVp2Scyh8dByu2lCRx91g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrieelgdekgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcuhghh ihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedtvdehgeffhfffvdeffefhgfejffelhfetveffffektefgtdej tdeivddtveehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: <86zh04iwtp.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.25; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264870 Archived-At: Hello, On Mon 15 Feb 2021 at 06:13PM -08, Karthik Chikmagalur wrote: >> Indirect clones and non-indirect clones are quite different. >> >> There is already a convention to use 'n' for a non-indirect clone -- see >> M-n in Info-mode. > > I see, I was unaware of this. Thank you for letting me know. > > Do you also intend to bind `C-x x c' to `clone-indirect-buffer' then? Personally I'm happy with C-x 4 c but if you think it makes sense to have both you could open a bug. -- Sean Whitton