From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.erc.general Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: ERC Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:23:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87ilymxqop.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87tuih3jfq.fsf@gnu.org> <875yuwpr4o.fsf@gnus.org> <87o88f746a.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf3jcaml.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14949"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs-erc@gnu.org, Stefan Kangas , Stefan Monnier To: Amin Bandali Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 12:24:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mUnoU-0003iQ-FR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:24:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUnoT-0005BJ-HN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUnnQ-0003x3-MQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:50727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mUnnO-0003qW-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E19240029 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:23:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1632738217; bh=L0w3EPzYkuEMFCXRsAnqm5shDDfY6tJwX5yO3mdgtjo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=UX6zCU43UIMKTmIu6r0MizhieHiwV98NtKSEztPRgx7MjywqPyYVWyvFKPVTgMmcB n+uBVwULpiprOJI4nZhFzQ11GRQ9AaFgZaez2m09r9h4A+skfKSj48sl0L8ZeZGYa2 +t3T9UFX7jflZevR3fiFEH/SVc0IJeuzYm4Z+WU3nuP6yxcX+NJ48sh4azxh36vhWC 8wAWV5bOmYsjD0DD5nHGs/ES7Hpr6UFDWnpNNz1Suc9ijxIG+sWKDO3sjlmgWY1tnx 2jXLpnMjvnB/JzXe/5ELSmSauU7pev5r/GPae+bL6uKNoHs7Gc1FJrfnDzYpS4ETVf emsCY2FpK5TnQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HHzHq4Kssz6tm9; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <87lf3jcaml.fsf@gnu.org> (Amin Bandali's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2021 17:03:46 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275566 gmane.emacs.erc.general:1606 Archived-At: Amin Bandali writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> Amin Bandali writes: >> >>> Oh, right. I just recalled that we used to have an `erc-compat.el' >>> that we obsoleted last year. I think I will revive that and put it >>> back into lisp/erc/, and that the additional things I wanted in there. >> >> I just marked the unused stuff in there explicitly obsolete, so it >> should be easy to just move it out of obsolete/ and continue from there. >> >> Perhaps it is better to do it before Emacs 28.1 to avoid any confusion, >> even if the only concrete step is to move the file out of obsolete/. >> > > Thanks. I've been a bit torn about restoring `erc-compat.el' > vs. potentially working something out with Philip's `compat.el'. > However, I suppose if we're very close to `emacs-28' being cut (as in > days ?) and if `compat.el' is currently mainly only a proposal and not > being urgently added, To clarify, compat would be an ELPA package (and if accepted, it wouldn't be added before Emacs 28.1 is released). >it would probably be better for me to go ahead > and restore `erc-compat.el' sooner rather than later (in a day or two) > and do what we already used to for ERC in the past anyway. -- Philip Kaludercic