From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30204: 27.0.50; Changing major mode resets non-default invisibility spec Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 19:50:22 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87ily5f3yh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87lf55cxvj.fsf@gnus.org> <97574057-8212-4812-93CF-0C2EC7EA8B39@gmail.com> <87ilzfo13i.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnvtlgn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgsrmk75.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8825snj.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf34qxoq.fsf@gnus.org> <871r4uphq5.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3229"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 30204@debbugs.gnu.org, p.stephani2@gmail.com, Richard Stallman To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 10 19:34:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mZciG-0000ad-3s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 19:34:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49714 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZciF-0004Bd-3I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZci2-00046u-Mf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZci2-0004ln-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZci2-0001qi-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 17:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 30204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30204.16338871967018 (code B ref 30204); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 17:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2021 17:33:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55772 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZchH-0001p6-T1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:33:16 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:51041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZchF-0001oX-PQ for 30204@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CF3960009; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216817 Archived-At: >> "Clean" is not a very clear name for this, because the idea that >> having no text properties is "cleaner" is a matter of taste. Some >> might not make the connection between the word "cleam" and what this >> does. Thus, people will have more difficulty remembering the name >> from the meaning and vice versa. >> >> I suggest renaming it to "no-properties-mode". > > I think `no-properties-mode' sounds pretty awkward, but I don't really > have much of an opinion here, one way or the other. Since it strips all text properties, then maybe 'stripped-mode'.