From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ligature support Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 16:56:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87ilx6iokv.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6ittp5r.fsf@gnu.org> <8ff3b131c53b9df49236@heytings.org> <834k91th5c.fsf@gnu.org> <8ff3b131c5fe09753ca0@heytings.org> <83mtmtru6l.fsf@gnu.org> <8ff3b131c57f741d04e5@heytings.org> <83lf2drqx6.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf2c3k0z.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnlwqocq.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnlwyox9.fsf@gnus.org> <83lf2cq7n5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnlnkxbo.fsf@gnus.org> <83cznfdohr.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqik9bk.fsf@gnus.org> <83v916d64z.fsf@gnu.org> <878ry2k6qz.fsf@gnus.org> <83tugqd488.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqiiq8c.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1bud3or.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1buipf5.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38186"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 05 16:59:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1cO-0009hF-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 16:59:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1cN-00005E-9v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1Za-0004GZ-Vy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:59068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1ZY-0006kQ-Il; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:56:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vuVMDLhNMiVLjK9pcrLN+aCCzo1bwycgoK7u6XRih3o=; b=eF+YnrFxMpk8ZIJ7ltpMSmcH48 cBZdRFd0v99ji9yfUd7dydhsWQvG2lnoPbVvNABvGVCV21Ky+mmBg65W/QbkSKavVIEAomNYC9nMt Lq4V9nLyGlafT3l2rv6gPbgvXzLqwheXkX0Gp+w5A0giBMNkg7uEEpdnZkCGuKQy86vA=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1ZS-000683-UA; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 16:56:05 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Coffins's _Defilements_: "Till Dawn Of The Dooms Day" In-Reply-To: <87r1buipf5.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 05 Nov 2021 16:37:50 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278783 Archived-At: I see that the harfbuzz people say that we should just run all the text through hb_shape instead of doing it selectively like we do it now: --- Full text shaping is the only way to get this right. Everything else is a hack, and piling hacks on top of hacks is just storing maintenance problems up for yourself. --- How big a performance issue would it be to just run all the text through hb_shape? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no