From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/emoji vs emacs that maybe =?utf-8?Q?can=CA=BCt?= display emojis Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87ilx5we51.fsf@turtle-trading.net> References: <87y263ko4i.fsf@gmail.com> <837ddmerxn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13785"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 06 15:31:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mjMj7-0003T3-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:31:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjMj6-000247-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 10:31:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjMhu-0000zO-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 10:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from odoacer.turtle-trading.net ([93.241.193.16]:39673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjMht-0006wk-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 10:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from zenobia.turtle-trading.net ([192.168.2.111]) by odoacer.turtle-trading.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1mjMhn-0002DH-0Y; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:30:03 +0100 Original-Received: from benny by zenobia.turtle-trading.net with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mjMhm-000cwg-NO; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:30:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <837ddmerxn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:57:08 +0200") Received-SPF: none client-ip=93.241.193.16; envelope-from=benny@turtle-trading.net; helo=odoacer.turtle-trading.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278873 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Does it behave correctly wrt the display width of the displayed Emoji? > That is, does string-width agree with the number of columns the > displayed Emoji takes on the screen? Works fine here with Gnome-Terminal. Font is set to "Monospace", which is an alias for "DejaVu Sans Mono", if fc-match is to be believed. benny