From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56323: 29.0.50; [v2] Add new customisable phonetic Tamil input method Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 16:01:14 +0530 Message-ID: <87ilofiz65.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pmiqe4da.fsf@gmail.com> <878rpdq99n.fsf@gmail.com> <83fsjldl2b.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu81osgp.fsf@gmail.com> <83czepdj0z.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmioq51w.fsf@gmail.com> <831qv4erwf.fsf@gnu.org> <87r134aiwd.fsf@gmail.com> <83wncwd7gy.fsf@gnu.org> <8735fkkvqd.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7y8c983.fsf@gnu.org> <87letcj974.fsf@gmail.com> <83k08wc7a3.fsf@gnu.org> <878rpcj5ne.fsf@gmail.com> <83fsjjdiik.fsf@gnu.org> <874jzzkivs.fsf@gmail.com> <83czendhee.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8sfj1u1.fsf@gmail.com> <837d4vdfbk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2637"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56323@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 12:32:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aQ7-0000Yk-H9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:32:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aQ6-0001V2-GY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 06:32:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aPy-0001Uu-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 06:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aPy-0004oN-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 06:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aPy-0003rt-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 06:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 10:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56323 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 56323-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56323.165675788614820 (code B ref 56323); Sat, 02 Jul 2022 10:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56323) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2022 10:31:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39868 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aPN-0003qy-Po for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 06:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f193.google.com ([209.85.210.193]:42844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7aPM-0003ql-0s for 56323@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 06:31:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f193.google.com with SMTP id d17so4654994pfq.9 for <56323@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 03:31:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3YDzuuJy/6YM6GYEd/66N0ThV/Y83uw4NuoSZCur3g=; b=MHqrnFsBJG6MBIdegdhrSr7MkdEzE1E+BsDGh/s+6rksSMaWFW8HA267VwsKH2JkGe KOucF4/nUehCjaRLOv/R0EiEETej730cqNIZktxQOFvCgH2w5dyM4cAMDMpiR4Shsmwu r5I5JZ7RktwoW+jXedbPwcLcxQBJhwrCVOpTzSlRv2PljDpgpbVmrHAJxkq/PD5KXIPT p1IDvGAKgxRw/wlIvvqtzSRrATKwT60CR0HG21vP20wVd7/zvP0Yt6xRxonU3Ak4Iu2S GXx5yfgSXt6iQbtaD6yk6PlKu0RKtQRx9aevsUeMAdfZmOc3gejiYdr7UQ2wm1yR4bqY trQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3YDzuuJy/6YM6GYEd/66N0ThV/Y83uw4NuoSZCur3g=; b=PEdvdUmy/lj4aspbuSk+laGEhzxAewkvv7gcR2lXdXHZlYZeOQQ+nFSFk1FzbGyQxG hodliEB4N24MdNvhiJoQXKX2we9T5aVS6H3JONphzoGzZbXLTa/OnH7G49dG9wwLTZHI LkmnAllTy4Ty50tkqJKPj4Fpv5Op5mTaOSbWybPBDTaso2+oCi+Sk6ZYVy/nNxvjzl5F f3q8t36gIec4qqg3P/EyR76KKRGN6NfvjTiNGanX5j8bcUXzRKFso9+pu5F5Gzu4BQ/0 tjJYuKoSo9opvEuhLI54wlq3oz6Sp2Ol0rya1/crKV5/zVajTenwTMiszak7fmztfGFc KbJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/z1jiIrST+5yG1vMxZNNoszgs1OOPRUSgPUDzMALPGXaW+c6o9 wR1PEODWHKIbgpR9QqdyIYg+KDtmazc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sqjCOMgOCoGvMIHuJgSxSfUZ7bMt5oTYxWuzv6Y8chw5CzsYwKtPsw44tFcv+qJ7OFozJoMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8c50:0:b0:40c:fa26:9738 with SMTP id q16-20020a638c50000000b0040cfa269738mr15842709pgn.541.1656757877938; Sat, 02 Jul 2022 03:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([49.204.136.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g19-20020a62e313000000b0051ba8b742e4sm17276312pfh.69.2022.07.02.03.31.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 02 Jul 2022 03:31:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837d4vdfbk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:38:55 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:235873 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=A9=E0=AE=BF =E0=AE=9C=E0=AF=82=E0=AE=B2=E0=AF=88 02, 2022]= Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > So, then please explain what should be the "correct" order within each >> > sub-list. Is the correct order within each sub-list in the ascending >> > order of the codepoint? If not, what is the correct order? >> > >>=20 >> The correct order is not the ascending order of the codepoint, the >> correct order is >>=20 >> =E0=AE=95 =E0=AE=99 =E0=AE=9A =E0=AE=9E =E0=AE=9F =E0=AE=A3 =E0=AE=A4 = =E0=AE=A8 =E0=AE=AA =E0=AE=AE =E0=AE=AF =E0=AE=B0 =E0=AE=B2 =E0=AE=B5 =E0= =AE=B4 =E0=AE=B3 =E0=AE=B1 =E0=AE=A9 >>=20 >> and their respective codepoints are >>=20 >> 2965 2969 2970 2974 2975 2979 2980 2984 2986 2990 2991 2992 2994 2997 29= 96 2995 2993 2985 > > Why is this the correct order? Does it have any definition based on > some principles, not just on the above list? I'm not sure if there is a principle behind it. Is there a principle behind why a comes first after b? Same thing, I suppose. But it does raise my brow when I see them out of order which is why I'm bothering to sort them.