From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/eglot-texi-manual 4725c123f3 2/5: ; eglot.texi: Fix typos and minor inconsistenciesfeature/eglot-texi-manual 4725c123f3 2/5: ; eglot.texi: Fix typos and minor inconsistencies Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:35:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87ilkeu3r1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83h6zyye3f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16144"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 14:46:51 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1olUwk-00043X-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:46:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48886 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olUwh-0003MS-Ir for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olUWs-0008Oa-Do for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 08:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olTpy-0002IF-Kv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:35:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]:35584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1olTpl-0003Oa-Un; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id m29-20020a05600c3b1d00b003c6bf423c71so2129564wms.0; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :gmane-reply-to-list:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S23p3YGjj+6KQ+VM0Hko7K4pjAKqgD3bzDLFljdC1/M=; b=hxV89LwBP3HipVK7Uf0lEB1oIPlJ9PTvw6o2DmES5rPp3hCV5ZJLhnxIfSlOkoO2Aq N60kFGkFMICR6yotyLe39g0uW0g1Hp830uJyXAXa2xgfFAaSz+G4Hvps4oaFirIEnHH+ d/EdTBAAeouta/KT285aZ3c4ybaotVP6qeHVetLiTRRfrF9ywvq+NoC02cm4IIKSfXFX BaE3tsSbUPRLPlbWJOEUEe4TdJFCryR8T96ndU0zNxDwAzHEiPu1ftsH1SOqGWHb3p0u U+VcJnPflmoA4D970N0X3Qy8FxJw/lo11mmyBu96PeBajBHL6NeB3Us1xOL9UzEjdWsp FuFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :gmane-reply-to-list:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S23p3YGjj+6KQ+VM0Hko7K4pjAKqgD3bzDLFljdC1/M=; b=bI71YK7ALbyUdOjL4leWJ3gV0ibq44fTfdhQ0ryxf2yHeMjuWZSnIlBTj0Evjqcl7I kiKxdriltRRsy5bRwutMJzeZsKcT+shx2Co4yK5ksIuoNr6oAp4L6uTF74RNXBbktcKC LdWmVq5+reoTGBeojt6YE1621QkdFnApo/OUz2QXNWmiS56WuqA5upoqFdOBZw2jHBF8 BW4qrU5KCE7VvA4lYYErFlRMRGz3TXoSG/uDTkBYdCs6YjiGseriafI4nmJUiXt+CeW/ yGzeK2O7WMq45MqRSaYxZmNAeRBJeVRkCIcioNnJH7qS6aFH2prT25kAct4BYvQ+COSC oIdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0Yo66eH/CaDNupJeIciyVgZ+TbUj2O1wQcsOLMyjmnq3lSM2XB gyu8nIlWHYrKyIzQFFobaitECDd4GpE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4kURiLcKRxBxqxyP2AJdc3gUFvknHlCQBIgV7Pi8iws7ZOfoyam5puHmzU6nDASoAJ8y0aug== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d1a:b0:3c6:d715:2d69 with SMTP id l26-20020a05600c1d1a00b003c6d7152d69mr9046516wms.145.1666265731502; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o16-20020a056000011000b0022e38c93195sm15858035wrx.34.2022.10.20.04.35.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:35:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83h6zyye3f.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:38:28 +0300") Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32e; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298144 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:38:28 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: Eli> I don't understand many of these changes. They seem to be personal Eli> stylistic preferences, in which case please revert them: there's Eli> nothing wrong with alternative stylistic preferences. Most of them are preferences, but this one: >> -on. @xref{Eglot and Buffers}, for more details of what does Eglot >> -management of a buffer entail. >> +on. @xref{Eglot and Buffers}, for more details of what Eglot >> +management of a buffer entails. The original is not wrong, it just scans somewhat awkwardly. >> -languages which are only supported by the @code{etags} backend. >> +languages that are only supported by the @code{etags} backend. Eli> And this one? What's wrong with using "which" in that case? Nothing, except that there are some grammarians who believe that there is an iron-clad infallible rule which governs when to use 'which' versus 'that', which most of us don=CA=BCt care about [1] (and I=CA=BCve ye= t to see an example where using the 'wrong' one was unclear). Robert Footnotes: [1] Please nobody try to explain this rule. It=CA=BCs been done, it doesn=CA=BCt need to be done again. --=20