"Philip Kaludercic" <philipk@posteo.net> writes:

>
> All I have been providing are a few optional suggestions and giving you
> information you might or might not know, you are the best judge of what
> you want the package to look like.  If you say you want a
> "description.txt" file to contain a description of the package, that is
> absolutely fine.  Another option is just a plain "README" file, without
> any extension.  ELPA detects these by default, so the package
> specification wouldn't have to list it.

And I thank you for that!  At the end I think if ELPA extracts the
readme for C-h P etc. from the Commentary section, that's all that is
needed.  So I removed the :readme value altogether and leave it at the
Commentary, as you suggested.