From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/auctex f124fe7d28: Release GNU AUCTeX 14.0.3 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:07:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87il2hwxtj.fsf@posteo.net> References: <170844508291.3153.9183498620897065719@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240220160445.7C360C00227@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <878r3f13z9.fsf@posteo.net> <87cysq3tts.fsf@gnu.org> <877cix51w0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38004"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 21 18:08:36 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rcq5D-0009e3-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:08:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcq4G-0006T1-Mb; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcq4F-0006SW-Db for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:07:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcq48-0004TJ-JF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:07:34 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59DB240031 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:07:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1708535245; bh=QhNMCKG/NolB6Ydc4C2CO43/ahPTIl3yPTcbl3WEQyo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=UOhDyiaLvavpgXr6p4JYwnJjbEHlHxVTaXfMy96klFYQnAy+BE6+ie4DTU1SizMZH eufJ1lXmE5vhXck950ATWpyiPFoUxQODMoZYddRUmibklzbnnRnUOvd0MDG6Jb/XQW mNzzO38P2yswnB1kOUEr57KtKKQ4q2W29L5T/PsCtJp7d9EEW6nbqnJJoSdfGHI/mB ApT/5XtqnMKU2QqDAStqAucc5kwBNA5onhMdk0aO0rjBpDS2qVzC6n/8Kh+4f0ddW3 7Fbixln9QqLpKC62UniCywXbTpCT3JuQLScT+cF313y8sciqYfNf3rXFrYztq9G+A9 FU3QfWW5+lZqQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Tg2kw3Flzz9rxR; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:07:20 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:24:06 -0500") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316419 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>>> Because back then, `elpa.gnu.org` was not able to generate them. >>>> Nowadays, we could use >>>> >>>> :doc "doc/auctex.texi" >>>> >>>> in the spec instead. >>> >>> Can :doc be a list? Because there's also preview-latex.texi. >> >> Yes. >> >>> Does that mean the ELPA devel package could be built from our master >>> branch always reflecting that and the normal package, too, after version >>> bumps? >> >> Almost. >> >>> Well, at least in theory after adding a Version header and somehow >>> setting the version when generating auctex.el from auctex.el.in? >> >> That's right: we still need the `auctex.el` file to be in Git and to >> contain the `Version:` thingy. > > Another idea might be to have a separate :main-file for versioning, if > there is an advantage in building auctex.el while preparing the package. Never mind this, I missed Stefan's message. >> >> Stefan Stefan Monnier writes: >>> Well, at least in theory after adding a Version header and somehow >>> setting the version when generating auctex.el from auctex.el.in? >> >> That's right: we still need the `auctex.el` file to be in Git and to >> contain the `Version:` thingy. > > Tho, it could actually be another file (e.g. for Tramp we have > `:main-file "trampver.el"`). > > Stefan