From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Paul Wallington Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Init error message Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:00:14 +0000 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hea7xvz5.fsf@china.shootybangbang.com> References: <1fgba.43206$sf5.31886@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net> <24Oba.66302$qi4.41393@rwcrnsc54> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047560553 23476 80.91.224.249 (13 Mar 2003 13:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 14:02:31 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18tSLu-00066R-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:02:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18tSKI-0002l8-03 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:00:50 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!host217-44-221-152.range217-44.btcentralplus.COM!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 10 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-44-221-152.range217-44.btcentralplus.com (217.44.221.152) Original-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1047560418 69717778 217.44.221.152 (16 [170119]) X-Orig-Path: china.shootybangbang.com!news X-Attribution: jpw X-Face: R(_z-rF:grdKO.*u`n); p.i$Eiz=h^CO5eDYv"4:K@#\HN09*Ykx}}B{kF/KH}%f_o^Wp List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:7556 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:7556 Le Wang wrote: > It's in my (and our) interest to see both efforts continue and > thrive. This is a matter of opinion. See for example: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=rjd6z1x1qt.fsf%40ssv2.dina.kvl.dk Do you think a merge is desirable? Do you agree that in order to merge the projects, one of the projects has to be shutdown?