From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Build failure under Suse 10.0 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87hcxlnxdz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87odrt5r9q.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17734.36719.594533.108256@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162254393 24016 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2006 00:26:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 31 01:26:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GehSW-0006aP-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:26:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GehSW-0000cK-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GehSG-0000Xz-Sd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GehSF-0000Uh-9w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GehSF-0000UK-5t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GehSF-0000tk-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22F4D4E441; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:32 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17734.36719.594533.108256@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Tue\, 31 Oct 2006 12\:49\:03 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61446 Archived-At: Nick Roberts writes: > > > I don't have any strange gif_lib.h files lying around and the > > > relevant lines in /usr/include/gif_lib.h look ok to me > > > > What configure options did you use? Does an ordinary ./configure && > > make work? > > Working out why a build fails for someone else's system is way over my head > but the tarball currently seems to be a pre-pretest. If we made the next > one a pretest i.e announced it on other mailing lists/websites, isn't it > more likely that fixes will be posted for these failures? True. The most glaring building/distribution bugs have been ironed out, so unless something else comes up, I'll roll a 22.0.91 tarball tomorrow and we can make the pretest announcement.