From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tim X Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is there a mod-emacs? Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:16:44 +1100 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <87hchpuner.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> References: <4870e7ae-ab72-4d0b-8d42-9a4ed0a54e8d@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <871w8vwb2e.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> <86prwfz310.fsf@timbral.net> <87sl1auqke.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199756473 23336 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2008 01:41:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:41:13 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 02:41:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC3TA-0005b0-HI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:41:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC3Sn-0003aA-HT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:41:09 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:21BRHWCpA4q45gsctCXrVYkF+yw= Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Original-Lines: 22 Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:155156 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:50573 Archived-At: Mathias Dahl writes: > Tim X writes: > >> Another approach that might be interesting is to create an emacs >> lisp package for common lisp. You could then take advantage of >> mod_lisp. Not sure how you would handle the lisp1 vs lisp2 >> differences > > Both are Lisp2, aren't they? Maybe you thought about lexical vs > dynamical scoping? Your right - not sure where my head was at. The different scoping, package/namspaces and things like buffer local variables etc were some of the differences I was thinking about and not the seperation of variable/function namespaces, function shadowing etc. Tim -- tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au