From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Hagelberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; pcmpl-ssh-hosts breaks when known_hosts file has a space in the wrong place Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:50 -0700 Message-ID: <87hce9ebcd.fsf@hagelb.org> References: <8763viza9c.fsf@hagelb.org> <87iqzgx77t.fsf@hagelb.org> <18408.3798.278043.611553@fencepost.gnu.org> <87hcebngak.fsf@hagelb.org> <87abk2akt1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207857403 10940 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2008 19:56:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Emacs developers To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 10 21:57:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jk2qo-0004WD-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:54:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk2qA-0001IR-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk2pZ-0000gB-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk2pV-0000bJ-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jk2pU-0000b7-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from sd-green-bigip-207.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.207] helo=spunkymail-a8.g.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jk2pN-0001BX-6q; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from dynabook (dsl081-164-175.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.164.175]) by spunkymail-a8.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEB610BE0A; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87abk2akt1.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:29:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94896 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: >> Recently it's come to my attention that there's already a function that >> does this in tramp: tramp-parse-hosts will return a list of user/host >> pairs, though on my machine it also returns some key signatures. (I >> imagine it could use some debugging as well.) > > Do you mean tramp-parse-shosts? However, this function cannot work > when hostnames in known_hosts are stored in a hashed form like this: > > |1|qgSiQ74dNQtRpDaIQHcQgREbNgs=|jwi3ho8zMuJlFvEEiyufB/wVHeU= ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAQEAqIGXkE+SgOSOmLqSQHSpsZEVm9Nm2lDzZ0h2RVvtiTzluHYIyuIkMPANvoeFhtmTpXbIllkcXoTUYCCFBc0fpO4O+nTsZmqY0kr52HCmMfMmTvhi+4dlKeLp8UBSaso9XODohFqYyzbMna1sG9S5osSKFHzrKfh4IdLr1fspw97JhSyY1/hzWL2xRR+ljtlwRs3Z1evyasH1UhI/8zyTGv5dUUgCZiNcZyMS5va2FsUChkE2Xjoh1zmDzSmtN62Me7kZCg3+FftH8PT3WMvaGBfLRPfKjwJ3y2KkbodU2z4XMBkFMXNRL9/d5DPkrDc+4vFmKRieKVWBBwr87k7o1Q== Yes, this is a known limitation of both libraries. It's mentioned in a docstring in pcmpl-unix.el that you must add "HashKnownHosts no" to your SSH config to make it work. >> Clearly this shows some redundancy that should be removed. But I'm not >> sure what the best way to go about this is. I don't think pcomplete >> should require tramp, nor vice-versa. Perhaps it should be spun out into >> a third file that the other two require? I don't feel I have a great >> grasp on how files are organized within Emacs. > > In principle, I agree. But Tramp has also a life outside GNU Emacs 23 ... Ah; in that case perhaps they should both be left alone. -Phil