From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:54:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87hce7rmbg.fsf@gmx.de> References: <8763unt4nz.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208024106 8000 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2008 18:15:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Peter_Dyballa@Freenet.DE To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 12 20:15:39 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkkGF-0008Vl-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:15:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkkFb-0000I8-8s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:14:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkkFU-0000H9-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:14:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkkFS-0000GA-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:14:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkkFS-0000G3-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:14:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkjxw-0008CR-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:56:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkjxq-0001qO-06 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:56:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkjxh-00088e-DU for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:56:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkjxg-00088A-UL for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2008 17:56:23 -0000 Original-Received: from p54864F80.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO debian) [84.134.79.128] by mail.gmx.net (mp053) with SMTP; 12 Apr 2008 19:56:23 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/U9SxtknvUwQF9Qwb3SU8s2pn6t9zNU5VTjqJ+Lz DCEMeVRbU8zyhB In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:24:20 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110008 (No Gnus v0.8) Emacs/22.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95069 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21996 Archived-At: On 2008-04-12 19:24 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Sven Joachim >> Cc: Peter Dyballa , emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:32:32 +0200 >> >> On 2008-04-12 15:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> >> From: Peter Dyballa >> >> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:00:23 +0200 >> >> Cc: >> >> >> >> This file is not deleted by 'make clean', so upon a new build its >> >> number is incremented and more and more DOC files get installed. >> > >> > I think this is intended, as you still have the Emacs binary from the >> > previous build (emacs-${version}.buildnumber) around, and could use >> > it, e.g., for comparison or some other purpose. >> >> That's not true, the Emacs binaries are all deleted by `make clean'. > > Maybe I completely misunderstand the issue at hand: are we talking > about files in the build directory or in the install directory? The build directory. > ("make clean" is relevant to the former, not the latter.) Of course. > If Peter and you are talking about the build directory, then the > previous DOC should probably be removed, but do we really want the > build number NOT to be incremented anyway? I'm not certain I understand that; make clean removes all the emacs* binaries from the build tree and therefore should also remove the then useless DOC-* files. It probably makes sense to reset the build number to 1 after that, doesn't it? Or what do you mean? Sven