From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2410: 23.0.90; tramp: spurious ftp-error Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:02:23 -0500 Message-ID: <87hc2nkf40.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 2410@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235229870 3896 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2009 15:24:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2410@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 21 16:25:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Latjd-0004IY-2e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:25:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LatiI-0006Pm-P5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:24:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lathe-0006Am-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:23:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lathc-00069l-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48984 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lathb-00069d-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:59276) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Latha-0003jp-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1LFNawt001898; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:23:36 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1LFA4gU030949; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:10:04 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2410 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2410-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2410.123522848928596 (code B ref 2410); Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2410) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 21 Feb 2009 15:01:29 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1LF1Qwm028590 for <2410@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:01:27 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1161257E21A; Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:02:23 -0500 (EST) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:23:40 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25550 Archived-At: > When I use Tramp to do an ftp transfer from Dired, I get error messages > like this: > > Copy `/local/path/of/source/file' to > `/ftp:name@server.dot.com:/remote/path/of/destination/file' failed: > (ftp-error FTP Error: DIR failed: usage: ls [remote-path [local-file]]) > > However, the file transer was in fact successful. This started > happening some time within the last two or three weeks, I believe, > though I cannot date it precisely. I can't reproduce this easily, since I don't have access to an FTP server for testing. Could you try bisecting prior revisions to find when this bug first appeared? Thanks.