From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:23:55 -0400 Message-ID: <87hbvsynas.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87fxbcvplf.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <1251426402.31028.27.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <837hwoclva.fsf@gnu.org> <1251458160.31028.44.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <83zl9kaws3.fsf@gnu.org> <1251467757.31028.51.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <83tyzsav7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87ocq03ryn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251473793 23309 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2009 15:36:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: zappo@gnu.org, eric@siege-engine.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 17:36:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mh3Uz-0004ta-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:36:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45760 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh3Uz-0004ud-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:36:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh3J7-00077v-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh3J3-00073P-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46098 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh3J3-000737-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po41.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.98]:49351) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mh3Ix-0004EU-SU; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:23:56 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014244.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.244]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po41.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n7SFNtgX010345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:23:55 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 40F19C070; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:23:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ocq03ryn.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:58:56 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114766 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: >>> semantic.el >>> semantic/lex.el >>> semantic/analyze.el >>> semantic/analyze/debug.el >>> semantic/analyze/fcn.el >>> semantic/analyze/refs.el >>> >>> which would show up in requires as: >>> >>> (require 'semantic) >>> (require 'semantic/lex) >>> (require 'semantic/analyze) >>> (require 'semantic/analyze/debug.el) >>> (require 'semantic/analyze/fcn) >>> (require 'semantic/analyze/refs) >> >> Ah, that's fine with me, of course. It's similar to what I suggested, >> but with the additional advantage of being specific in `require'. > > Good, then that's the approach we'll take. One minor disadvantage of this approach, BTW, is that we'll need to revise our byte-compilation process. Otherwise the semantic/foo.el files won't be byte-compiled during "make bootstrap" or "make recompile". But this change probably isn't difficult.