From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Basic Bazaar guide for Emacs hackers. Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:31:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87hbsc81wt.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87skbzblp5.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y6log42q.fsf@red-bean.com> <87y6lo8zgi.fsf@telefonica.net> <87638sy5ab.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tywc8u7t.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y6lowm3h.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ljho8pgt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87vdgswewc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259595356 17529 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2009 15:35:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 16:35:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NF8Ht-0003dr-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:35:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55042 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8Ht-0002Jq-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:35:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8Hm-0002Jd-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8Hi-0002J7-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:35:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34537 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NF8Hi-0002Iz-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:35:30 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47261) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NF8Hi-0006Cg-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:35:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NF8Hc-0003SZ-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:35:24 +0100 Original-Received: from 17.red-83-40-116.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.40.116.17]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:35:24 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 17.red-83-40-116.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:35:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 17.red-83-40-116.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kIHrCgfCwkZOuafO/bmCp4fD1U8= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117968 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Óscar Fuentes writes: > > > It seems contradictory to point out the cost of support associated to > > having several workflows and then reintroduce one workflow when the > > author deleted it for alleviating the problem. > > It would be if (a) Karl and I were the same person and (b) the wiki > reported conflicts. Karl's action has nothing to do here. Wasn't it clear on the quoted text? I was talking about you: > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > > Óscar Fuentes writes: > > > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > > > On the other hand, how many VCS transitions have you managed for > > > Emacs-sized projects? I've done two so far. I can say from > > > experience the cost of support is not polynomial in extra workflows > > > during the transition. > > > > Okay. Your experience trumps over my reasoning. Page deleted. > > I'm going to keep a copy (unless my browser has crashed in the > meantime ;-) and integrate some of it into the section of our page on > stacked branches. Is that OK with you? -- Óscar