From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5361: .elcs should tell more about the .els they were compiled from Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:27:58 +0800 Message-ID: <87hbqs12hd.fsf@jidanni.org> References: <4B4BDA3B.5060608@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263264781 32018 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2010 02:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5361@debbugs.gnu.org To: jasonr@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 03:52:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUWsD-0003wY-JT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:52:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUWsE-0006wE-5B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:52:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUWsA-0006vs-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:52:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUWs3-0006vT-NL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45880 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUWs3-0006vQ-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58639) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUWs3-00058M-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUWVC-0008Hp-6i; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5361 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5361-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5361.126326328731810 (code B ref 5361); Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5361) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2010 02:28:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUWUI-0008H1-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.145] helo=homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUWUH-0008Gf-BS for 5361@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-6-10.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.6.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by homiemail-a7.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE6A525C05F; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:28:00 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:29:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34220 Archived-At: >>>>> "JR" == Jason Rumney writes: JR> If they are compiled by different versions of Emacs, then you can only JR> safely assume they are different, even if the .el files they were JR> compiled from are identical. Yes but if the user wants to know "were the sources different?". If a tiny bit of extra information were added to the boilerplate, then he would have the answer instead of needing forensic analysis or something.