From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: X11 Compound Text vs ISO 2022 Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:35:02 +0900 Message-ID: <87hbjeu14p.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280683617 9238 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2010 17:26:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david@harpegolden.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa To: James Cloos Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 01 19:26:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfcJK-0002Xf-MX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:26:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56739 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ofc48-0003ul-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49781 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfbUN-0002Gg-BR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfVNT-0005KH-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:02:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:41021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfVNT-0005DN-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:02:43 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA371537B5; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 18:35:19 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA6851A267B; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 18:35:02 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" ed3b274cc037 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128081 Archived-At: James Cloos writes: > The changes to the code go back many, many years, and I (as an Xorg > member) expect that the spec will be updated to match the code. Really? I can't say I'm terribly impressed with X.org's response to complaints that specs and behavior don't match.