From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:33:48 -0400 Message-ID: <87hbhb9p5v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <83zkv7rmpe.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq1us2hx.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyldqxut.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285604552 16136 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2010 16:22:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 17:35:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FiQ-0006fd-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:34:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58780 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0FiP-0002QM-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34351 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0FiF-0002PQ-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FiA-0000Ey-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po40.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.103]:58267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0FiA-0000Ec-LP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014154.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po40.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8RFXm7p019844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C8A0C018; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:33:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:52:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131007 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> What would it be called? XIINT? Eek. Uhm. XNINT? (For "not long >>> int.") :-) Ok, I have nothing. >> IXINT? > > XINT would be the obvious name, but it's already taken. > IXINT doesn't follow the "X..." convention we've used so far, but > I won't oppose it. We could go with XINT_int, otherwise. How about XINT for ints and XEINT for EMACS_INTs?