From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and
	elsewhere).
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:55:05 +0900
Message-ID: <87hbacqeba.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es>
	<AANLkTikonYboXC=BA+nWBF+dZdHMv-bX-vfsiiFVxZkD@mail.gmail.com>
	<87tyeivni1.fsf@wanadoo.es>
	<AANLkTimiuSOdOvkki9EGb7Nq43znjy8VHAZKJLE0ousH@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k4fevkc1.fsf@wanadoo.es>
	<AANLkTimG3G3oqLuXKedUwcwoduuSm_uLFmg1CGCsDT6=@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zko6rn8y.fsf@thysbe.localdomain>
	<BANLkTik8uiFeanqsNJUzRcw2CtqpK32Mxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<jwvaag5zmb5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<BANLkTikBnWttjEdu=d-QrR7TCz6=kwqhqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r59g4dne.fsf@ambire.localdomain>
	<jwv8vvow4im.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302060201 4500 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2011 03:23:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 03:23:21 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>,
	Nils Ackermann <nils-gmane@ackermath.info>,
	Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 05:23:16 2011
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Q7JKt-0004wi-PI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:23:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48463 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Q7JKt-00082Z-6x
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:23:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41221 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7JKX-0007l3-SO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:22:54 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stephen@xemacs.org>) id 1Q7JKW-0001rc-Mn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:22:53 -0400
Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:38252)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stephen@xemacs.org>) id 1Q7JKW-0001pV-Cf
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:22:52 -0400
Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
	[130.158.99.156])
	by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B11597036C;
	Wed,  6 Apr 2011 11:49:38 +0900 (JST)
Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4EAD91A27A8; Wed,  6 Apr 2011 11:55:05 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <jwv8vvow4im.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
X-Mailer: VM 8.1.93a under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" eac2e6bd5b2c+ XEmacs Lucid
	(x86_64-unknown-linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138206
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/138206>

Stefan Monnier writes:
 > >>>>> "Thien-Thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:
 > > [void]
 > 
 > I'm not sure I agree.

But it's vacuously true!