From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:40:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hba5yq0p.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Q9DfN-00007M-08@fencepost.gnu.org>
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> > However, did you really intend to make the buffer length parameters signed?
> > I would have expected those to be of type size_t, not ssize_t.
>
> We call these functions with an argument of type EMACS_INT,
If you're going to do that, why not declare it as an EMACS_INT?
The problem with using external standard types is that some developers
will proceed to "correct" them, and the compiler won't tell you about it.
Of course if you happen to be paying attention (which is most of the
time to be sure), the patch will get rejected, but it seems to me
using EMACS_INT will forestall that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-11 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 8:55 oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 9:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 11:08 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 11:28 ` David Kastrup
2011-04-11 11:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 12:27 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 12:31 ` David Kastrup
2011-04-11 21:54 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-12 4:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 13:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-12 13:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 14:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-12 17:00 ` Large file support (was: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter) Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-14 20:57 ` oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Michael Welsh Duggan
2011-04-11 14:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 11:40 ` Stephen J. Turnbull [this message]
2011-04-11 13:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 1:16 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 3:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 5:06 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 5:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 8:19 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 9:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 15:53 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 16:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 23:55 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-13 5:14 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 6:31 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-13 6:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 8:15 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 9:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 16:06 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 17:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 19:31 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 19:59 ` PJ Weisberg
2011-04-14 4:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 20:02 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 6:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 14:35 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 13:13 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 16:34 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-15 18:20 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 1:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-15 8:55 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-15 9:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-15 10:24 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 12:32 ` Davis Herring
2011-04-12 13:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 15:43 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hba5yq0p.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp \
--to=stephen@xemacs.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jim@meyering.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.