From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completion-list-mode-map Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87hb5h6mg4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4DEA3F21.2020302@gmail.com> <4E07B9F0.3080102@gmail.com> <4E0F40A1.3020503@gmail.com> <4E0FB543.9040608@gmail.com> <4E13BC5A.2070007@gmail.com> <4E191159.1080501@gmail.com> <4E375A1C.6020108@gmail.com> <87ty9jganp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r54md7yt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4ABCA1.1060703@gmx.at> <4E4AD90C.4060007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313532393 1929 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2011 22:06:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 00:06:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QtRmF-0008QB-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:06:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36916 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtRmE-0003Pq-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtRmB-0003Pi-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtRmA-0007Au-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:23 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]:34972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtRmA-0007Ac-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([128.36.14.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7GM6Ja3007236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:06:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E4AD90C.4060007@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:54:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143335 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > You imagine me call a function with a -window postfix whose first > argument is KILL and whose second argument is the window? Any other reason? If not, let's just rename quit-restore-window to quit-window, and live with the non-optimal argument order as a historical accident.