From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#276: 23.0.60; crash after C-x 5 1 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:45:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87hb4ilsek.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87y766garx.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315774015 31355 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 20:46:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 276@debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Hanchrow To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 22:46:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qvT-0006a2-Cz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:46:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qvS-0001Fr-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qvQ-0001Fb-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qvN-0001Bg-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qvM-0001BX-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:46:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qzV-0001KK-Nf; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 276 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 276-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B276.13157742045026 (code B ref 276); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 276) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 20:50:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qyX-0001If-GW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2qyU-0001IX-3u for 276@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8BKjdtu023980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:45:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:53:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.143 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:51:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50994 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Hanchrow writes: > >> I guess not. I just rebuilt emacs from scratch on a Ubuntu 11.04 box, >> and went through the repro steps. This time, instead of crashing, >> nothing at all happened: apparently, C-x 5 1, when done from a console >> frame, no longer kills X frames. Not sure that's the correct >> behavior, though. > > Me neither. Does anybody know whether this is intended, or just a > fallout of the recent window changes? The recent window changes have nothing to do with this. Since we got multi-tty in Emacs 23, delete-other-frames only deletes frames on the current terminal. Deleting frames on other terminals would generally be a nuisance. I think this bug report can be closed.