From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:26:53 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87hb05ne8i.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87hb0b3yoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6ED011D5-E185-44C6-BB31-A445A4E5F83A@gmail.com> <87wr976otx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqi6tzz.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <87ehve3ul8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lipl22xm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boqh20ha.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871urc46c9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <739bsoysp.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <87ty47r5yt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k452p5u3.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326119435 14112 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2012 14:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:30:35 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 15:30:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkGF5-0001gA-BB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:30:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46798 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkGF4-0002IF-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:30:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkGEt-0002EY-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkGEp-0002U0-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkGEp-0002Tw-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 09:30:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkGEn-0001VV-IS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:30:13 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:30:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YkA112iI5uIyPF8HKun/LN6fDTU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147515 Archived-At: On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:04:53 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> What I've now propsed, after Chong clarified the maintainers' position, >> is the same service, enabled by default but with no packages (so an >> interested user only has to customize one variable and it does nothing >> otherwise). I think that's the middle ground we've been looking for. >> I only need to know, from Stefan or Chong, if that proposal is OK and if >> it should go into the current trunk or if it should wait until 24.1 is out. SM> I don't see a problem with it, but it's too late for 24.1. OK, thanks. I'll add it after the release. Ted