From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12849: 24.2.50; Doc: `message': mention `message-log-max' Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 01:14:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87haoyxqk3.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352506436 16692 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2012 00:13:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:13:56 +0000 (UTC) To: 12849@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 10 01:14:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyi5-0003ip-OP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 01:14:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhw-0000UP-Et for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyht-0000UE-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhs-00049T-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhs-00049N-Oh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyi2-0001yw-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:14:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 12849 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13525064317590 (code B ref -1); Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2012 00:13:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhq-0001yM-4a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36335) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyho-0001yF-CM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhd-000460-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:38 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:45494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhc-00045w-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhc-0000T3-5O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyhb-00045j-0b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:55248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TWyha-00045d-Mz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 19:13:34 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([89.204.130.15]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDgPG-1TYdO70jtu-00GaWx; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 01:13:33 +0100 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:1Kei9gbPX09oCTnawokGv+0xOJUAXqU9lbLVNmx+rOu baHmyNQxFJrlQQlI58mKMbqbW1pZQRx5WEWBMNg9yxSBhxTTZX hwVADE0YrHu+R5q1Xaknx2WBZvSqyD0sTfi70MMq1Z4U39/Nuz CluANeF5InU1+T52uf5dw36fSvtw5JN985CY2I3WiuBqRPleOU 3opYV9WtcMccGhR9cjGThjnygpbPwmnUiX/jca7/RQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66716 Archived-At: Hi, I made the experience that many people don't know that logging messages (printed with `message') in the *Messages* buffer can be prevented with binding `message-log-max' to nil. Indeed, it's not easy to find in the doc, and the name `message-log-max' also doesn't sound as if this variable could have this effect. I think we should mention this effect of binding `message-log-max' to nil in the docstring of `message', e.g. by changing this sentence: The message also goes into the `*Messages*' buffer. to The message also goes into the `*Messages*' buffer if `message-log-max' is not nil. Thanks, Michael. In GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-11-01 on dex, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot package, version 2:20121101-1) Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10707000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (wheezy)