From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jj.retorre@gmail.com (Jean-Jacques =?utf-8?B?UsOpdG9ycsOp?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: HOWTO: lightning fast Emacs on Linux multicore Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:43:25 +0100 Organization: Guest of ProXad - France Message-ID: <87h9xzh6xe.fsf@none.nowhere.com> References: <871tpdl29g.fsf@debian.uxu> <87r3x4z2my.fsf@debian.uxu> <87bno7h9kj.fsf@debian.uxu> <87ppcnh915.fsf@none.nowhere.com> <87y4rbfu1k.fsf@debian.uxu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416127525 1418 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2014 08:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 08:45:25 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 16 09:45:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XpvSQ-0004KC-9B for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:45:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XpvSP-0005gt-W0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:45:17 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!news.kjsl.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!novso.com!nerim.net!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!212.27.60.64.MISMATCH!cleanfeed3-b.proxad.net!nnrp4-2.free.fr!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: Bariumenemanilow X-Drdoom-Fodder: satan security root passwd CERT crypt X-Emacs-Acronym: Elsewhere Maybe All Commands are Simple Emacs: putting new limits on productivity. X-Meat: Parma Microsoft: With our software, there's no limit to what you can't do! X-NSA-Fodder: AHPCRC red noise Closure smuggle TRW Leitrim X-Tom-Swifty: "The judge sentenced him to the chair, " Tom said dielectrically. Tomato: Green X-Windows: it could be worse, but it'll take time. X-Zippy-Says: Yow! Legally-imposed CULTURE-reduction is CABBAGE-BRAINED! User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5ygKL+yC9QxhPvbfV8PUkIXZyV0= Original-Lines: 21 Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Nov 2014 09:43:50 CET Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 37.161.191.22 Original-X-Trace: 1416127430 news-3.free.fr 2311 37.161.191.22:37499 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:208677 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:100954 Archived-At: Emanuel Berg writes: > jj.r&torr&@gmail.com (Jean-Jacques Rétorré) writes: > >> Have you measured how much faster it is on your >> system ? > > No, but if you know of some benchmark or syntactic > workload I can run sure, I'll do it. I dont. I do the trick on my eeepcX101CH (Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N2600 @ 1.60GHz) and I dont see any significant difference. > > But this is not about batches of computation, it is > the interactive responsiveness, which is much more > difficult to measure. (But actually as think batch > will be faster as well.) -- JJR.