From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:26:39 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <87h9xyn8fk.fsf@debian.uxu> References: <87egt4ulg4.fsf@debian.uxu> <877fyvh97x.fsf@debian.uxu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416173426 6393 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2014 21:30:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 21:30:26 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 16 22:30:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq7Ok-0004Fu-RI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:30:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xq7Ok-0007eA-0u for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:30:18 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 24 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: feB02bRejf23rfBm51Mt7Q.user.speranza.aioe.org Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:FHAxOgASxLHT0bDdnw3FD+KfFGk= Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:208694 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:100972 Archived-At: Dan Espen writes: > If you like the brighter higher contrast colors, I'd > agree Nano looks better. > > The colors are easily fixed. Yes, I know you can change the colors in Emacs :) > If you don't like 2 lines of your screen being taken > up by a display of shortcuts, Nano looses. Unfortunately not. Just because you can configure things in Emacs and spend a lifetime doing so doesn't mean other editors are completely unconfigurable. Try this: nano --nohelp --morespace Damn! nano wins again! -- underground experts united