Eli Zaretskii writes:

> Then why are you writing a separate library, which is "similar to
> seq.el but for maps"?  Why not have a single library that handles all
> of these objects: lists, strings, vectors, alists, and hash-tables?

Isn't it better to treat sequences and maps separate kind of
collections?  They are IMHO too different to be both in the same
library.

Nico
-- 
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr