From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questions about isearch Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:03:11 +0000 Message-ID: <87h9k74pkw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83lh9lx6oi.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8q1x1cn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448625931 21729 80.91.229.3 (27 Nov 2015 12:05:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 13:05:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a2HkW-0003fH-CA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:03:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56084 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2HkY-00039Y-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:03:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2HkF-000376-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2HkB-00049V-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:35967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a2HkB-00048S-Ow; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:03:15 -0500 Original-Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so53020220wmw.1; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:03:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XUHyEsKBxjG/5/l6xbzSXyl5/++QrbgFO0rmgK6W1+U=; b=mgHbUky8XV52Q9kVVKSdIFHeNg1N0SUMuACWQMctG8Pb9urWd3wQJZoow1eho3tHy1 5bLlU2OKkrQz1LPAb49kj/3P+TZmcMeUVCxkaNgxYyST2yg8jSoOoPCBgTQ9/XCKg3TT wvS51WiiU2vUsPmsMT18bwjoA5HmJrM+uM3n1AaX9MwOgw778waUnoHg2qmtxEEqVnLn j0Ot9SuNL6l/kOnY6r4hwzcyo/jABoduvwa55ykxyNiHMx6QOplM7N0Nb4DwUk4f691S /FarLEHBOvWiVQ12ZY5UOIS6k8K7HTwwgfb9y4ZwIZPmBZ4CSp3gmkNzFasGfll93XPo gE9g== X-Received: by 10.28.24.199 with SMTP id 190mr10627094wmy.101.1448625794933; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:03:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Gandalf-Linux.gmail.com (host-78-151-181-156.as13285.net. [78.151.181.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ft4sm32346641wjb.37.2015.11.27.04.03.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:03:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83a8q1x1cn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:36:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195371 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > No, I meant to ask why it doesn't work already. AFAIU, the > decomposition of =EF=AC=80 is "ff": > > (get-char-code-property ?=EF=AC=80 'decomposition) > =3D> (compat 102 102) > > but searching for 'f' doesn't match the ligature. It does for me. In this very buffer, if I isearch for 'f' I can get to the ligature above. Are you sure char-fold was ON when you tested? > (=C3=A6 doesn't have a > decomposition in the Unicode database, so maybe it's a different > case.) True. If people think it makes sense, we can add an ad-hoc rule for 'a' to match '=C3=A6' >> > 2. It also doesn't match =C3=A4 (a single character) with a=CC=88 (2 c= haracters, >> > which Emacs correctly composes into 1 grapheme cluster). Should it? Done now.