From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:39:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87h9cbpw61.fsf@web.de> References: <8760stvwzp.fsf@web.de> <834m8cvu9p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467232798 29223 80.91.229.3 (29 Jun 2016 20:39:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: me@wilfred.me.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 22:39:49 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIMGy-0005jj-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:39:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45677 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIMGx-0000c0-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIMGS-0000ao-3u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIMGQ-0007nG-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:59056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIMGL-0007mI-3T; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:39:09 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([79.216.83.88]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCIoz-1b9nXX0jcv-0094uj; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:39:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834m8cvu9p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2016 19:23:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:l30YRtKQspaZrcKBAXURvz4jj0gA/i/QRlMCJD6Y0yiEaONKXlI imB4BYphTKw1+5o5R/He/dArA81ekBwD4rBkJfzEsTTEKOgST/wJH/Sc36MEDUOCMsp6oD1 zgWsrIqm/xLXBnC1c3dc+RrcmuoQNJQx7vMU8RDjawHu+1I2kpJpLhuDOXY8D6rD41gF3yZ Oly0oJYIVtn969WWfwd9Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:XY1U7ihtDO4=:OCgwIt9kmbfFMLKB8iO5Tn TsPytETJczSdhcETTNGc77P0/bSC4BoR0K1aS81idi1NQHmNMbHXK0ZSLhewQ0iWJcVMUAyZ9 sSEfXcnyRil5cGnkBR6EQlHO7GSuFcsUYaAUTiFWg0SGNVw7bs7cMGv9gZYsSHBHIdrvlp/kF 5oPyeH3lE0uKMPLKGq2snqRzYheIdheZqyToahfBzYcJXhb5dNKFxSoiBMnRO2/5nHQTYcETi ADUMeHdIHygWRyN9IMv64HNdcHb6narDcsUEARbqUjPGmJSROxjYnQ7c8zFZqF0bOdFhDiPej AOwi30igfdC933GWRegUXLFVo2OmjUfkdUCBVdLzeldCoYKH6UAMi4sOhrJybp7FF78ApmEwJ 4/TyJ6Mve2E/1GXMotntJkdfWfw5f9QGsmu6ZneXVEbTbtguCtTLjme9HTqnlEuZyvWhnqB3x qMCMNRlxA25aaOlSheUiZJkHdOebSze1mTgwTkNXaDH0ZrhTQ9zYmVltVWqqBdqe0dpxmZOwe 4wEQZykZzdOlj0Hhb4dtSAhxkfmJrJoTfBcW3fbWnaclCMjA7zdzjWqp0mjgcZKNTEhFx34nr Y2rmnYu3uC0zcsusLI5mE+PDfcBj+XY4z0pP3u3NORnfUg3TXxMGaicFXXO/uON/GeaJgKkzy 68JjyxbDggLe/7VGvcxAWHLG2MvQ3eH3UvszzSJ01MfJ2Rdzrpa69wrTZmpNvRLYnLD02fei1 isecOeZH66FrBrE7+bYvfFRuRjl6Lcr3p13xrpMbDITmFcb/DIGfv3zejTVLdHiwTI+zbTpO X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204949 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I see no strangeness: I cannot reproduce the problem, neither in Emacs > 24.4, nor 24.5, nor the current pretest of Emacs 25.1. > > So I'm going to claim that OP's Emacs 24.5 was compiled by a buggy > compiler or something. I see the same behavior as the OP. I use a build of emacs-25, HEAD -> 6cdd8f71 (1 week old), on Debian. Michael.