all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 23478@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: bug#23478: 25.0.93; Mouse region selection asymmetry
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:24:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9c6mkb0.fsf@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83furqratc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:38:39 +0300")

On Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:38:39 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:

>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  23478@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 16:33:55 +0200
>> 
>> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >
>> >>> From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
>> >>> Do you really think this should be conditioned by a user option?
>> >>
>> >> I do, but let's hear from others.  Anyone?
>> >
>> > This behaviour seems much preferable to me, since otherwise it's not
>> > clear which text gets selected.  I'm not in favour of adding an option,
>> > but if there must be one, at least let this new behaviour be the
>> > default.
>> 
>> I agree on both points (prefer no option, but if so default to new).
>> 
>> > Regarding the code, I notice that using (sit-for 0) works as well.
>> 
>> Thanks.  Indeed, even a negative number works.  But zero does seem the
>> least arbitrary.
>> 
>> > A comment to explain what the calls are for would be nice.
>> 
>> I'll do that when the final version is settled on.  Eli, John, what's
>> the decision on making this behavior customizable (and if yes, what
>> default)?
>
> I think backward-incompatible behavior should almost always be opt-in,
> unless we have no choice.

Opting in does, however, have the problem of discoverability (a NEWS
entry notwithstanding).  I think opting in is best in cases where it's
likely that some people may prefer (or some code may depend on) the
existing behavior, or where the new behavior may bring a disadvantage in
some case.  But I don't think any of that is likely in this case
(indeed, I really think the existing behavior is a misfeature).  Your
concern about the interaction with scroll-conservatively applied to my
initial patch, but you yourself suggested a better alternative that
allays this concern.  Given that, I ask again, and not rhetorically, do
you see a strong downside to having the new behavior be the default?

Steve Berman





  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-03 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-08 15:44 bug#23478: 25.0.93; Mouse region selection asymmetry Stephen Berman
2016-05-08 16:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-05-08 18:31   ` Stephen Berman
2016-05-08 18:54     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-05-08 19:41       ` Stephen Berman
2016-05-08 19:45         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-02 23:16           ` npostavs
2016-07-03 14:33             ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-03 15:38               ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-03 22:24                 ` Stephen Berman [this message]
2016-07-04  2:38                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-04  8:45                     ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-04 14:57                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-04 16:56                         ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-04 18:26                           ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-05 17:23                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-06 16:40                             ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-06 18:44                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-07 12:08                                 ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-07 15:29                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-07 16:22                                     ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-07 16:48                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-07 17:02                                         ` Noam Postavsky
2016-07-07 17:16                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-07 18:26                                           ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-08  9:58                                             ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-08 10:14                                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-07-08 15:38                                             ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-07 17:04                                         ` Stephen Berman
2016-07-04 15:29                       ` Drew Adams
2016-07-05  1:32                         ` npostavs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h9c6mkb0.fsf@gmx.net \
    --to=stephen.berman@gmx.net \
    --cc=23478@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.