From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9300x5n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <2C5C5C6E-9D73-4613-948B-C15B93968717@raeburn.org> <83poiy8cnv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r32mqq5f.fsf@gnu.org> <83zih1jf37.fsf@gnu.org> <8A8DA980-13A7-4F8B-9D07-391728C673C9@raeburn.org> <831su4dmn4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489238329 16013 195.159.176.226 (11 Mar 2017 13:18:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:18:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ken Raeburn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 14:18:45 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmguu-00032m-K1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmguz-0000NR-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmgut-0000NM-EH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmgus-0007oz-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:58373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmgum-0007lM-U0; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:33 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vgPpG1vZJz3hl7f; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan01.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vgPpG0Xllz3hjkB; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan01.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8WsAAZtdMM3U; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:29 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: QTHZOaGqx6Ppq62fVHC5xCzIf8UNMkAYZ8dDZADt64ht27j6veZ++qxy3Kc7GvLA Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-18-143.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.18.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8AD42C522C; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:28 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I smell like a wet reducing clinic on Columbus Day! In-Reply-To: <831su4dmn4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:27:11 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.18.0.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212902 Archived-At: On M=C3=A4r 11 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > So I think the issue could be that this defvar somehow doesn't end up > in dumped.elc as an abbrev table under the new build procedure. Does t= hat make sense? I think the problem is that an abbrev table is actually an obarray, which does not have a suitable print syntax. ELISP> global-abbrev-table [## 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0] ELISP> (abbrev-table-p [## 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]) nil Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."