From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Yuri D'Elia Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26153: 26.0.50; Garbage displayed at visual line boundaries Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 20:31:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87h92q5qkz.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> References: <87tw6q6bh3.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83h92qyaqy.fsf@gnu.org> <87r31u64nb.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <83a88iy7a8.fsf@gnu.org> <87pohe5zd2.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <87k27m5vg0.fsf@wavexx.thregr.org> <831stuxy02.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489865607 16411 195.159.176.226 (18 Mar 2017 19:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:33:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: 26153@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 18 20:33:21 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK6E-0002jI-UB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 20:33:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK6H-0002vA-GB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK66-0002tT-Dq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK62-0008Us-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK62-0008UY-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK62-0007kr-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Yuri D'Elia Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26153 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26153-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26153.148986552329711 (code B ref 26153); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26153) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Mar 2017 19:32:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34322 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK55-0007j9-EK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from erc.thregr.org ([46.43.2.63]:43058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpK53-0007ic-9Z for 26153@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.106.183.2] (helo=localhost) by erc.thregr.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1cpK4z-0004BX-PG (envelope-from ); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 20:31:57 +0100 In-reply-to: <831stuxy02.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130712 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 18 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Sorry about that. Did you try configuring with REL_ALLOC=no? That > is, > > REL_ALLOC=no ./configure ... > > This should avoid at least the problems with segfaults during dumping. No difference :/