From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25122: 24.5; function describe-variable hangs on large variables Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:35:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87h91b4ftx.fsf@drachen> References: <20161206022112.GF25778@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87twahk19y.fsf@gmail.com> <87d1h4fld5.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <871sxkyv2m.fsf@gmail.com> <87mvcs8j7w.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87lgsbtxwe.fsf@gmail.com> <871su38ogm.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d1dnrq96.fsf@gmail.com> <87wpbu7f9i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87r32278wf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87lgs97pg5.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87innd6zti.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <878to653tr.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87fuh6s75x.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87mvb8paeg.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d1bzlt1g.fsf@drachen> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1493203607 19585 195.159.176.226 (26 Apr 2017 10:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:46:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25122@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 26 12:46:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KT5-0004zp-4P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:46:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KTA-0006S2-PC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KIn-00056i-5v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KIk-0007zQ-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KIj-0007z9-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KIj-0006BI-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25122 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 25122-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25122.149320292723701 (code B ref 25122); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25122) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2017 10:35:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40600 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KIB-0006AD-Bz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:35:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:61457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3KI9-00069z-Ag for 25122@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.73.21.103]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LZvUH-1dp0JZ1nnJ-00loOe; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:35:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d1bzlt1g.fsf@drachen> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:57:47 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:APp75JMBQe4x6oGk22V5sBAEQ72zn0LiKRYF2cgJC0PJG+jt/x7 4pLXIbgAVNm6tiW+5x+rcxGQHPeUBH3nmkJqr4C8SsdA5OO4S0CvpbNUyWTdt/0rWEwT0B7 lXYJ3F9lCi5Qe3TY32t4cSWoDJQpKRAjpEjgBNEoVtsJpkEyrtEsV+Mi2H9p4xTCI2peUei weTGxiFbs/1iftEWy5fkA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:C4ZkcSwc9/M=:zbkIi7cAnVtlPVk/kYAZ1E VfArM964UN+UvJz4ePwxUyyda6SsZci644Qhoh6/gT+6mxQl7TId1nHvJD6KxMVvUxokEtswx xXs93lKT/xXrX+9lmCQypvfcjRsWyAZVGPS0pRgAmCYRIV81dCtNjvJ9/1UCOmStWjTy3jTX/ 2Ebr5adIT7O9s/Da8smgJKeCtye3A8Nk2FDXESVi94QrrHbd8fEMZjn9J1IYA3jO/fTuDLyWi v8XwboPoVFAm1gbNSg44exRV8PnKucWhwMzBH2gBYJikH8gk5wE2ELHL1/ijgZwBCH46FTqIu WlKm1H82P0Y+TVOF/jSugntcWLSvthiFC4+5lfQj0N/C35pVnowYC8YVQ6Y9+/UMlzi+KGYN9 f6oJWMs0f5bSA4Ng305SfQayUaT5p0SACe24pof8YuPsYYs9r6XJUvQKELY1YOQ7MWRzjvvzb wp/K1DZvyhMVptxo5qr0S9Skhxjeoj5PV0EwC1m1BP4jHYAKVfNoXupttaHXANgF3BWgEU2uj 6WJJAd5Ng0QNheWDe/Ma43SIHQ8dU7rXoh8aO/b5loUfB7CGFlci4h7Eb0pXFSFToUpJd3GP4 1m9YmTjNks2iXkHhKi7tAGL7OWqeXuUgbgY39nTgdorwUyX0cgGv+DjyG8DsEFFrynWt9arFo XJ6GXSJijxJWXcQ2XurDIjBxOMdGXAszJiVotrOBWL70wIVnxAweygRyks0FvCLj1vms6YBAB GamqADCyXdy2nple5zGQy9ZEy5Vlvvu9KcFlJRrvpNzdwgobn9ucUwR07QzF3tv66Uq9283H X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132005 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Would you expect your improved `indent-region' is fast enough now so > that it makes sense that I switch back to it in my code? Is the > running time now something close to O(number of lines to indent)? After some tests, I think it is fast enough for my scenario. And I see from the comments in the code that you addressed the complexity problem. Michael.