From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28605: 26.0.60; Part of leftmost character hidden Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:16:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8v8znob.fsf@gmail.com> References: <59CE8E74.5010308@gmx.at> <59D35549.6030905@gmx.at> <87wp4c750c.fsf@gmail.com> <59D4A45F.5010606@gmx.at> <87tvzfjfcp.fsf@gmail.com> <59D5E8F6.8080002@gmx.at> <87efqikk0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a815lq3w.fsf@gmail.com> <59D73C6F.3020907@gmx.at> <87o9pk65ae.fsf@gmail.com> <59D74E49.2000605@gmx.at> <87a8145wcr.fsf@gmail.com> <59D88B8B.6050205@gmx.at> <87d15z6uo1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <59DB2C8C.7040706@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507540639 24985 195.159.176.226 (9 Oct 2017 09:17:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:17:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ola Nilsson , 28605@debbugs.gnu.org, Kaushal To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 09 11:17:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UBV-0005CF-Sk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:17:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56807 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UBY-0007FV-Jc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UBQ-0007FQ-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UBK-0008Tw-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UBK-0008Tr-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UBJ-0000pO-SR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28605.15075405953136 (code B ref 28605); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2017 09:16:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UAq-0000oS-6d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:48926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1UAl-0000oD-HL for 28605@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 05:16:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i124so20476388wmf.3 for <28605@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:16:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=p7+12lEun4PBkiq/Vn8+6KTx8a2G/1a8nk+/PTPfHHk=; b=R5qK7eVyCvIzePaIg5yVZlC2CxSyBfSX6eKbE71zraDq7QKEg09CSdn8EKfwDKytaW Sy6hkEUuY69zRu//8EKiPjK24juSPz5sMuz5K3mUdCesWTvg7yICiWbpBfwHgK6jhV/m Jr67V4RnmHOElt55h+VBsgtwxRKTRXowWYVBl8wfz7+9WOMLvkmnduvNEeAfuvfxpX4m pTOyLwiMHmew/y8k6zjqTQwbuoUYSDFkbcEU/MchND6/wjGhE/SRnk1mxN5Q+Eas24WC AhfbZobWRrRMenAdbtUmRnm9qU6mfSPfzI3djAlLyuZ09MuMuBkq2+Dduy8kvxpZIJQL R28g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=p7+12lEun4PBkiq/Vn8+6KTx8a2G/1a8nk+/PTPfHHk=; b=gbQK99fxs4dhHkyY5K+zGqYZKD9v86LJ03iU/8/YJGhBS0w17c3+wO4TfX/sOyuSw5 7c6QmVbpzeK83sbH2DVcJjuwT1hZZQNpH5PxLt2QV7kVkrds/EZn25WDfMuMQ1w/2IRe ukSBoDZVIdk8+H7R2pkG8WRbvdSQJp9vNmggTMetCMG0vU5CjUlbVNnx20wqUSCXLNZK Fh6DgPnondfrFs5aiyyLAwflQNF/bW1go3khFQbdr7BCIuNrN22Pndq4M+3ul7FXDeEP iqlDgctEAr2UfSLCDYa46tsi1NgowLM3A2NYIFqy3rpOCXeKiBy2hrIvXFl5KOGfwtZl S8nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUl2COYf3J8QMPdG9YVexY3L+13N7Dg3eZifQuRYXEK8P3ksGAA 7IEyXdMhyMhZWio1UTLz0EI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDXuoNl9ezO8dxjRPG9b4dmnG0Hb9Xgtj3PekQTzBomtXEKGrgyUT4KtqK8Y02gwZkiJUHC8w== X-Received: by 10.80.207.195 with SMTP id i3mr3509983edk.55.1507540581676; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i61sm6190763edc.32.2017.10.09.02.16.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 02:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:25:40 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138108 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > martin rudalics writes: > >>> If I remember correctly, in some places it looked at the GDK_SCALE >>> environment variable (which is normally not set on most systems) and in >>> other places it queried GTK for what the scaling is, leading to general >>> confusion of what the frame size was supposed to be. >> >> OK. Are we sure that we now detect any scaling if present? Or should >> we allow the user (who might know better) to explicitly supply a scaling >> factor which overrides a return value of 0 (?) or 1 from the above. > > By "supply", do you mean setting the GDK_SCALE variable? I think that > the GTK function will pass us the right scaling factor in that case, if > I remember correctly. On modern machines, the user supplies the scaling > by using a GTK tool that doesn't set GDK_SCALE, and the GTK function > still returns the correct scaling. That's exactly what happens, although setting the GDK_SCALE variable directly affects the scaling factor returned from querying the widget, in case you don't want to use the tool. Robert